This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Coltorti, F. Articles by Ivey, T. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Coltorti, F. Articles by Ivey, T. D.

Circulation, Vol 73, 1321-1333, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Effects of varying electrode configuration with catheter-mediated defibrillator pulses at the coronary sinus orifice in dogs

F Coltorti, GH Bardy, D Reichenbach, HL Greene, R Thomas, DG Breazeale and TD Ivey

We compared two methods of delivering single damped sine-wave defibrillator pulses to the coronary sinus orifice in 20 dogs. Ten dogs had "unipolar" (coronary sinus to precordial disc) and 10 had "bipolar" (coronary sinus proximal to coronary sinus distal electrode) discharges. Delivered voltage, current, and energy were recorded during each pulse. Electrophysiologic testing was done before and 4 weeks after the procedure. Histologic examination of the atrioventricular groove was done at 1 mm serial sections. For the unipolar configuration a 200 J defibrillator pulse resulted in a peak voltage of 3370 +/- 125 V, a peak current of 21 +/- 4 A, and a delivered energy of 253 +/- 29 J as compared with 3010 +/- 99 V, 70 +/- 4 A, and 144 +/- 18 J, respectively, for the bipolar configuration (p less than .001). Three dogs (two with bipolar, one with unipolar pulses) had gross coronary sinus rupture and died from acute pericardial tamponade. In addition, irrespective of electrode configuration, all dogs showed microscopic rupture of the coronary sinus internal elastic membrane. Transmural atrial scarring occurred in all 10 dogs that received a unipolar pulse but in only two dogs that received a bipolar pulse (p = .0004). Unlike the atrium, injury to the left ventricle was limited in both groups. Similarly, injury to the periannular myocardium was inconsistent and not transmural in either group. No significant electrophysiologic changes were observed. With the present technique, unipolar rather than bipolar catheter-mediated defibrillator pulses result in transmural atrial injury that might prevent accessory pathway conduction. Regardless of electrode configuration, high-energy defibrillator pulses consistently cause some degree of coronary sinus rupture, most likely related to a barotraumatic mechanism.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Manoharan, N. Evans, D. Allen, J. Anderson, and J. Adgey Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Monophasic Waveform Delivered by the Passive Implantable Atrial Defibrillator With Biphasic Waveforms in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, April 6, 2004; 109(13): 1686 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]