Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1985;71:535-542

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melin, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detry, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melin, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Detry, J. M.

Circulation, Vol 71, 535-542, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Alternative diagnostic strategies for coronary artery disease in women: demonstration of the usefulness and efficiency of probability analysis

JA Melin, W Wijns, RJ Vanbutsele, A Robert, P De Coster, LA Brasseur, C Beckers and JM Detry

Alternative strategies using conditional probability analysis for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined in 93 infarct- free women presenting with chest pain. Another group of 42 consecutive female patients was prospectively analyzed. For this latter group, the physician had access to the pretest and posttest probability of CAD before coronary angiography. These 135 women all underwent stress electrocardiographic, thallium scintigraphic, and coronary angiographic examination. The pretest and posttest probabilities of coronary disease were derived from a computerized Bayesian algorithm. Probability estimates were calculated by the four following hypothetical strategies: SO, in which history, including risk factors, was considered; S1, in which history and stress electrocardiographic results were considered; S2, in which history and stress electrocardiographic and stress thallium scintigraphic results were considered; and S3, in which history and stress electrocardiographic results were used, but in which stress scintigraphic results were considered only if the poststress probability of CAD was between 10% and 90%, i.e., if a sufficient level of diagnostic certainty could not be obtained with the electrocardiographic results alone. The strategies were compared with respect to accuracy with the coronary angiogram as the standard. For both groups of women, S2 and S3 were found to be the most accurate in predicting the presence or absence of coronary disease (p less than .05). However, it was found with use of S3 that more than one-third of the thallium scintigrams could have been avoided without loss of accuracy. It was also found that diagnostic catheterization performed to exclude CAD as a diagnosis could have been avoided in half of the patients without loss of accuracy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams, E. M. Antman, C. R. Bridges, R. M. Califf, D. E. Casey Jr, W. E. Chavey II, F. M. Fesmire, J. S. Hochman, T. N. Levin, et al.
ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): 652 - 726.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, K. Fox, M. A. A. Garcia, D. Ardissino, P. Buszman, P. G. Camici, F. Crea, C. Daly, G. De Backer, P. Hjemdahl, et al.
Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2006; 27(11): 1341 - 1381.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Braunwald, E. M. Antman, J. W. Beasley, R. M. Califf, M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Hochman, R. H. Jones, D. Kereiakes, J. Kupersmith, T. N. Levin, et al.
ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 970 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al.
ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina)
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D de Bono
Investigation and management of stable angina: revised guidelines 1998
Heart, May 1, 1999; 81(5): 546 - 555.
[Full Text]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. L. Roger, S. J. Jacobsen, P. A. Pellikka, T. D. Miller, K. R. Bailey, and B. J. Gersh
Gender differences in use of stress testing and coronary heart disease mortality: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1998; 32(2): 345 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. S. Douglas and G. S. Ginsburg
The Evaluation of Chest Pain in Women
N. Engl. J. Med., May 16, 1996; 334(20): 1311 - 1315.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. C. Hendel, M. H. Chen, G. J. L'Italien, J. B. Newell, S. D. Paul, K. A. Eagle, and J. A. Leppo
Sex Differences in Perioperative and Long-term Cardiac Event–Free Survival in Vascular Surgery Patients : An Analysis of Clinical and Scintigraphic Variables
Circulation, February 15, 1995; 91(4): 1044 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
F. E. Kuhn and C. E. Rackley
Coronary Artery Disease in Women: Risk Factors, Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention
Arch Intern Med, December 13, 1993; 153(23): 2626 - 2636.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. K. Wenger, L. Speroff, and B. Packard
Cardiovascular Health and Disease in Women
N. Engl. J. Med., July 22, 1993; 329(4): 247 - 256.
[Full Text]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. S. Kotler and G. A. Diamond
Exercise Thallium-201 Scintigraphy in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1990; 113(9): 684 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. Detrano, K. P. Lyons, G. Marcondes, N. Abbassi, V. F. Froelicher, and A. Janosi
Methodologic Problems in Exercise Testing Research: Are We Solving Them?
Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1988; 148(6): 1289 - 1295.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. N. TOBIN, S. WASSERTHEIL-SMOLLER, J. P. WEXLER, R. M. STEINGART, N. BUDNER, L. LENSE, and J. WACHSPRESS
Sex Bias in Considering Coronary Bypass Surgery
Ann Intern Med, July 1, 1987; 107(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]