Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1985;71:458-465

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamurthy, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenberg, B.
Right arrow Articles by Krishnamurthy, G.

Circulation, Vol 71, 458-465, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Association between the exercise ejection fraction response and systolic wall stress in patients with chronic aortic insufficiency

B Greenberg, B Massie, D Thomas, JD Bristow, M Cheitlin, D Broudy, J Szlachcic and G Krishnamurthy

We studied the exercise ejection fraction response in 56 patients with chronic aortic insufficiency. All had left ventricular dilatation but preserved resting ejection fraction and minimal or no symptoms. The exercise ejection fraction increased by 0.05 units or greater in 18 (32%) patients (group I), remained within 0.05 units of the resting value in 18 (32%) patients (group II), and fell by 0.05 units or greater in 20 (36%) patients (group III). There were no significant differences among the groups in left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, end-systolic dimension, or fractional shortening by echocardiography or in resting left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by radionuclide angiography. Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress was significantly higher in group III than in either group I or group II (89 +/- 20 vs 70 +/- 18 and 69 +/- 17 X 10(3) dyne/cm2; p less than .005). At peak exercise there were no differences among groups in systolic blood pressure. However, end-systolic volume increased from 65 +/- 28 to 77 +/- 36 ml/m2 in group III and fell from 50 +/- 21 to 28 +/- 18 ml/m2 in group I during exercise. Thus, at peak exercise end-systolic volume was nearly three times greater in group III than in group I. Although stress could not be determined directly during exercise, the directional changes in its determinants suggest that it also would have been higher in group III patients. A highly significant inverse correlation was present between the ejection fraction response and the change in end-systolic volume (r = -.87, p less than .0001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
2006 WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, October 7, 2008; 118(15): e523 - e661.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
2008 Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): e1 - e142.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. R. Wollmuth, D. R. Bree, B. P. Cupps, M. D. Krock, B. J. Pomerantz, R. P. Pasque, A. Howells, N. Moazami, N. T. Kouchoukos, and M. K. Pasque
Left ventricular wall stress in patients with severe aortic insufficiency with finite element analysis.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 840 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): e1 - e148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. O. Bonow, B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. C. de Leon Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O'Gara, et al.
ACC/AHA 2006 Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) Developed in Collaboration With the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 598 - 675.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. Bekeredjian and P. A. Grayburn
Valvular Heart Disease: Aortic Regurgitation
Circulation, July 5, 2005; 112(1): 125 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. P. Cupps, P. Moustakidis, B. J. Pomerantz, G. Vedala, R. P. Scheri, N. T. Kouchoukos, V. G. Davila-Roman, and M. K. Pasque
Severe aortic insufficiency and normal systolic function: determining regional left ventricular wall stress by finite-element analysis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2003; 76(3): 668 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. D. Cheitlin
Finding `Just the Right Moment' for Operative Intervention in the Asymptomatic Patient With Moderate to Severe Aortic Regurgitation
Circulation, February 17, 1998; 97(6): 518 - 520.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. Siemienczuk, B. Greenberg, C. Morris, B. Massie, R. A. Wilson, N. Topic, J. D. Bristow, and M. Cheitlin
Chronic Aortic Insufficiency: Factors Associated with Progression to Aortic Valve Replacement
Ann Intern Med, April 15, 1989; 110(8): 587 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J. Lindsay JR, A. Silverman, L. B. Van Voorhees, and N. G. Nolan
Prognostic Implications of Left Ventricular Function During Exercise in Asymptomatic Patients with Aortic Regurgitation
Angiology, May 1, 1987; 38(5): 386 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]