Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1980;61:897-901

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Savin, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stinson, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Savin, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stinson, E. B.

Circulation, Vol 61, 897-901, Copyright © 1980 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Left ventricular response to isometric exercise in patients with denervated and innervated hearts

WM Savin, EL Alderman, WL Haskell, JS Schroeder, NB Ingels Jr, GT Daughters 2d and EB Stinson

Patients with cardiac denervation resulting from allograft transplantation have been observed to increase their diastolic and systolic blood pressure during isometric exercise without concomitant cardioacceleration. To determine the mechanism for the blood pressure increase, heart rate, blood pressure, and ventricular volumes (measured using fluoroscopy of tantalum midwall myocardial markers) were recorded before and after a 50% maximal voluntary contraction. Seven cardiac transplant recipients (denervated heart) and seven nontransplant patients (innervated heart) were studied. Innervated and denervated heart patients increased systolic blood pressure by 16% and 21% and total peripheral resistance by 20% and 12%, respectively. The percentage responses were not significantly different between groups, except for heart rate, which increased 17% in innervated heart patients and 2% in denervated heart patients (p less than 0.05). Neither group had enhanced contractility or increases in cardiac output, suggesting that the blood pressure increases resulted in both groups from increased peripheral resistance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. S. Iskandrian, A. H. Hakki, N. L. DePace, and B. Manno
Alternative Methods to Detect Coronary Artery Disease
Arch Intern Med, May 1, 1983; 143(5): 873 - 875.
[Abstract] [PDF]