Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1975;51:370-378

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kristt, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kristt, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, B. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure

Circulation, Vol 51, 370-378, Copyright © 1975 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Learned control of blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure

DA Kristt and BT Engel

Five patients with documented histories of essential hypertension of at least ten years' duration participated in a triphasic study of training to control systolic blood pressure (SBP). Phase 1 was a seven week period during which patients took their BP (systolic and diastolic) at home and mailed these data to us daily. Phase 2 was a three week period during which patients were taught to control SBP using a noninvasive technique: patients were trained to raise, to lower and to alternately lower and raise SBP. Phase 3 was a three month period during which patients again took their BP at home and mailed these data to us daily. Results: (1) all patients learned SBP control: average increas 15%; average decrease 11%; (2) during SBP control heart rates, breathing rates, triceps brachii muscle tension and EEG activity did not change; (3) follow-up tests at one and three months showed evidence of retained SBP control; (4) baseline SBP fell from 153 mm Hg during laboratory training to 135 mm Hg at the three month follow-up; (5) phase 3 home BPs fell 18/8 mm Hg from phase 1 levels; (6) at home patients also were able to reduce SBP from 141 mm Hg (average) to 125 mm Hg (average) by means of the lowering technique learned in the laboratory.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav ModifHome page
D. A. Williamson
Recent Advances in Behavioral Medicine
Behav Modif, July 1, 1987; 11(3): 259 - 263.
[PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
HEALTH AND PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE and AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS
Biofeedback for Hypertension
Ann Intern Med, May 1, 1985; 102(5): 709 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
C. Cottier, K. Shapiro, and S. Julius
Treatment of Mild Hypertension With Progressive Muscle Relaxation: Predictive Value of Indexes of Sympathetic Tone
Arch Intern Med, October 1, 1984; 144(10): 1954 - 1958.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. WALD
Biofeedback Therapy for Fecal Incontinence
Ann Intern Med, August 1, 1981; 95(2): 146 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
E. B. Blanchard and S. T. Miller
Psychological Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease
Arch Gen Psychiatry, December 1, 1977; 34(12): 1402 - 1413.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. P. SHAPIRO, G. E. SCHWARTZ, D. C. E. FERGUSON, D. P. REDMOND, and S. M. WEISS
Behavioral Methods in the Treatment of Hypertension: A Review of Their Clinical Status
Ann Intern Med, May 1, 1977; 86(5): 626 - 636.
[Abstract] [PDF]