This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MIROWSKI, M. Articles by BRAWLEY, R. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MIROWSKI, M. Articles by BRAWLEY, R. K.

(Circulation. 1973;47:79.)
© 1973 American Heart Association, Inc.

---

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Low-Energy Catheter Defibrillation in Man

M. MIROWSKI M.D.¹; MORTON M. MOWER M.D.¹; VINCENT L. GOTT M.D.¹; ROBERT K. BRAWLEY M.D.¹

¹ From the Departments of Surgery, Medicine, and Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, and the Department of Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.

The effectiveness of low energy intraventricular catheter defibrillation was evaluated in 11 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery, in whom ventricular fibrillation occurred after anoxic arrest of 21-42 min. A distal electrode catheter was introduced through an atriotomy into the right ventricular apex. In eight patients the proximal electrode was a saline-soaked sponge placed on the superior vena cava, while in three this electrode formed an integral part of the superior vena cava cannula used in cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraventricular catheter defibrillation was accomplished in nine patients using 5-15 w-sec, considerably less energy than required for paddle defibrillation. There were no apparent short or long-term ill effects. Unsuccessful defibrillation in the two remaining patients was ascribed to difficulties in electrode placement. The effectiveness of low energy intraventricular catheter defibrillation in man, in addition to raising basic electrophysiologic questions, provides background for the development of the transvenous automatic defibrillator for protection of selected high-risk patients.

Key Words: Ventricular fibrillation • Sudden death • Transvenous automatic defibrillator

Submitted on July 13, 1972
Accepted on August 21, 1972

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. A. Strickberger and G. J. Klein Is defibrillation testing required for defibrillator implantation? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 7, 2004; 44(1): 88 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Glatter and L. B. Liem Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Current Progress and Management Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2000; 4(3): 162 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Winter, J. E. Heil, C. Schumann, Y. Lin, C. M. Schannwell, U. Michel, J. D. Schipke, H. D. Schulte, and E. Gams Effect of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator lead placement in the right ventricle on defibrillation energy requirements. A combined experimental and clinical study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 1999; 14(4): 419 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Fotuhi, R. E. Ideker, S. F. Idriss, R. L. Callihan, R. G. Walker, and E. U. Alt Influence of Epicardial Patches on Defibrillation Threshold With Nonthoracotomy Lead Configurations Circulation, November 15, 1995; 92(10): 3082 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. S. Manolis Transvenous Endocardial Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems: Is the Future Here? Arch Intern Med, March 28, 1994; 154(6): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Saksena and V. Parsonnet Implantation of a Cardioverter/ Defibrillator Without Thoracotomy Using a Triple Electrode System JAMA, January 1, 1988; 259(1): 69 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]