Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:e147
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.857573
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choi, B. G.
Right arrow Articles by Badimon, J. J.

(Circulation. 2009;120:e147.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Correspondence

Letter by Choi et al Regarding Article, "Effects of the Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator Raloxifene on Coronary Outcomes in the Raloxifene Use for the Heart Trial: Results of Subgroup Analyses by Age and Other Factors"

Brian G. Choi, MD, MBA

Division of Cardiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC

Gemma Vilahur, DVM, PhD

Cardiovascular Research Center (CSIC-ICCC), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Juan J. Badimon, PhD, FAHA

Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the subgroup analyses of the Raloxifene use for the Heart (RUTH) trial.1 Although this post hoc analysis did not show benefit of raloxifene for any prespecified group, we believe that one particular subgroup, not defined in this study, may benefit from raloxifene in the reduction of coronary outcomes.

Although RUTH did not show an overall benefit in postmenopausal women with established coronary disease or risk factors, osteoporotic women enrolled in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial who were at high risk for coronary disease had 40% fewer cardiovascular events than those receiving placebo.2 Why might there have been discrepant results between the hypothesis-generating MORE and the conclusive RUTH? MORE enrolled only postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, whereas RUTH did not use osteoporosis as an enrollment criterion. Might raloxifene be cardioprotective only in osteoporotic women?

In both experimental and epidemiological studies, menopause results in the curious phenomenon of skeletal orthotopic bone loss and vascular heterotopic bone formation.3,4 The cytokine-signaling pathways that regulate orthotopic bone remodeling also influence vascular calcification. It came as no surprise when we demonstrated that raloxifene, a bone-active drug, remodels vascular calcification. Via an increase in bone-morphogenetic protein-2, raloxifene influences vascular calcification morphology into a more laminar structure that may enhance plaque stability.5 However, in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis who may not have concomitant calcified vessels, as in RUTH, raloxifene would have benefit neither for osteoporosis nor for plaque stability. The MORE women, who were all osteoporotic, may be . . . [Full Text of this Article]