(Circulation. 2009;120:e147.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Correspondence |
Division of Cardiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC
Cardiovascular Research Center (CSIC-ICCC), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
To the Editor:
We read with great interest the subgroup analyses of the Raloxifene use for the Heart (RUTH) trial.1 Although this post hoc analysis did not show benefit of raloxifene for any prespecified group, we believe that one particular subgroup, not defined in this study, may benefit from raloxifene in the reduction of coronary outcomes.
Although RUTH did not show an overall benefit in postmenopausal women with established coronary disease or risk factors, osteoporotic women enrolled in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial who were at high risk for coronary disease had 40% fewer cardiovascular events than those receiving placebo.2 Why might there have been discrepant results between the hypothesis-generating MORE and the conclusive RUTH? MORE enrolled only postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, whereas RUTH did not use osteoporosis as an enrollment criterion. Might raloxifene be cardioprotective only in osteoporotic women?
In both experimental and epidemiological studies, menopause results in the curious phenomenon of skeletal orthotopic bone loss and vascular heterotopic bone formation.3,4 The cytokine-signaling pathways that regulate orthotopic bone remodeling also influence vascular calcification. It came as no surprise when we demonstrated that raloxifene, a bone-active drug, remodels vascular calcification. Via an increase in bone-morphogenetic protein-2, raloxifene influences vascular calcification morphology into a more laminar structure that may enhance plaque stability.5 However, in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis who may not have concomitant calcified vessels, as in RUTH, raloxifene would have benefit neither for osteoporosis nor for plaque stability. The MORE women, who were all osteoporotic, may be
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |