Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:1293-1303
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.796383
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Armstrong, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Welsh, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Fibrinolysis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction

(Circulation. 2009;119:1293-1303.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine

Is duration of symptoms the key modulator of the choice of reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction?

Duration of Symptoms Is the Key Modulator of the Choice of Reperfusion for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Paul W. Armstrong, MD; Cynthia M. Westerhout, PhD; Robert C. Welsh, MD

From the University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Correspondence to Paul W. Armstrong, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, 2-51 Medical Sciences Bldg, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H7, Canada. E-mail paul.armstrong@ualberta.ca


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 

Time has been transformed, and we have changed; it has advanced and set us in motion; it has unveiled its face, inspiring us with bewilderment and exhilaration.

—Kahlil Gibran1

The intense focus at the nexus between elapsed time and outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) signals its far-reaching implications for public health and the healthcare system. In this perspective, we demonstrate not only the time dependence of the 2 principal forms of reperfusion therapy but also how the efficacy of each depends on the baseline risk of the individual in whom it occurs, as well as where the event unfolds in time, space, and context. These variables play a crucial role in determining the choice of best therapy, thereby confirming the admonition that 1 size does not, and could not, fit all individuals in all circumstances at all times.2–4 A central issue that bears on the interpretation of the reperfusion literature is which of the various definitions of time is used. We will use the terminology summarized in Table 1 and explore opportunities to modulate the delay incumbent with STEMI treatment.


View this table:



 
Table 1. Time Definitions and Clinical Reperfusion

Response by Bogaty p 1303


*    Pathobiology of Myocardial Infarction and Time
 
An ironic divide exists between the precision of time-dependent laboratory observations on the extent of myocardial injury and the frustrating imprecision of this metric when applied to humans. The notion of reversible ischemic cell damage after coronary occlusion was framed more than half a century ago.5 Subsequent canine experiments demonstrated that ischemic necrosis begins . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. G. Kushner, M. Hand, S. C. Smith Jr, S. B. King III, J. L. Anderson, E. M. Antman, S. R. Bailey, E. R. Bates, J. C. Blankenship, D. E. Casey Jr, et al.
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2009; 54(23): 2205 - 2241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. G. Kushner, M. Hand, S. C. Smith Jr, S. B. King III, J. L. Anderson, E. M. Antman, S. R. Bailey, E. R. Bates, J. C. Blankenship, D. E. Casey Jr, et al.
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, December 1, 2009; 120(22): 2271 - 2306.
[Full Text] [PDF]