This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 119/5/717    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.815712v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Almond, C. S.D. Articles by Singh, T.P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Almond, C. S.D. Articles by Singh, T.P. Related Collections Congestive CV surgery: transplantation, ventricular assistance, cardiomyopathy Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery Related Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:717-727.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Pediatric Cardiology

Waiting List Mortality Among Children Listed for Heart Transplantation in the United States

Christopher S.D. Almond, MD, MPH^*; Ravi R. Thiagarajan, MBBS, MPH^*; Gary E. Piercey, BS; Kimberlee Gauvreau, ScD; Elizabeth D. Blume, MD; Heather J. Bastardi, NP; Francis Fynn-Thompson, MD; T.P. Singh, MD, MS

From the Department of Cardiology (C.S.D.A., R.R.T., G.E.P., K.G., E.D.B., H.J.B., T.P.S.), Cardiac Surgery (F.F.T.), and the Pediatric Transplant Center (C.S.D.A., E.D.B., H.J.B., F.F.T., T.P.S.), Children’s Hospital Boston; the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School; and the Department of Biostatistics (K.G.), Harvard School of Public Health; all in Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Christopher S.D. Almond, MD, MPH, Department of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail christopher.almond{at}childrens.harvard.edu

Received August 21, 2008; accepted November 24, 2008.

Background— Children listed for heart transplantation face the highest waiting list mortality in solid-organ transplantation medicine. We examined waiting list mortality since the pediatric heart allocation system was revised in 1999 to determine whether the revised allocation system is prioritizing patients optimally and to identify specific high-risk populations that may benefit from emerging pediatric cardiac assist devices.

Methods and Results— We conducted a multicenter cohort study using the US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. All children <18 years of age who were listed for a heart transplant between 1999 and 2006 were included. Among 3098 children, the median age was 2 years (interquartile range 0.3 to 12 years), and median weight was 12.3 kg (interquartile range 5 to 38 kg); 1294 (42%) were nonwhite; and 1874 (60%) were listed as status 1A (of whom 30% were ventilated and 18% were on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation). Overall, 533 (17%) died, 1943 (63%) received transplants, and 252 (8%) recovered; 370 (12%) remained listed. Multivariate predictors of waiting list mortality include extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support (hazard ratio [HR] 3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 3.9), ventilator support (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.4), listing status 1A (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.7 to 2.7), congenital heart disease (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 2.6), dialysis support (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0), and nonwhite race/ethnicity (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.0).

Conclusions— US waiting list mortality for pediatric heart transplantation remains unacceptably high in the current era. Specific high-risk subgroups can be identified that may benefit from emerging pediatric cardiac assist technologies. The current pediatric heart-allocation system captures medical urgency poorly. Further research is needed to define the optimal organ-allocation system for pediatric heart transplantation.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Circulation: Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 649-651. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. T. Hsu and G. D. Pearson Heart Failure in Children: Part II: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Future Directions Circ Heart Fail, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 490 - 498. [Full Text] [PDF]