| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2009;119:3101-3109.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
From the McGill Health University Center (T.H.) and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (L.J.), McGill University, Montreal; Direction of Public Health of Montreal (S.P.), Department of Social and Preventive Medicine (J.O.), and Montreal Heart Institute (P.T.), University of Montreal, Montreal; Department of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec (M.L.); and Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto (J.V.T.), Canada.
Reprint requests to Dr Thao Huynh, 1650 Ave Cedar, Room E-5200, Montreal, Quebec, H3G-1A4, Canada. E-mail thao.huynhthanh{at}mail.mcgill.ca
Received May 22, 2008; accepted April 17, 2009.
Background— Published meta-analyses comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction include only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We aim to obviate the limited applicability of RCTs to real-world settings by undertaking meta-analyses of both RCTs and observational studies.
Methods and Results— We included all RCTs and observational studies, without language restriction, published up to May 1, 2008. We completed separate bayesian hierarchical random-effect meta-analyses for 23 RCTs (8140 patients) and 32 observational studies (185 900 patients). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reductions in short-term (
6-week) mortality of 34% (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% credible interval, 0.51 to 0.82) in randomized trials, and 23% lower mortality (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% credible interval, 0.62 to 0.95) in observational studies. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with reductions in stroke of 63% in RCTs and 61% in observational studies. At long-term follow-up (
1 year), primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a 24% reduction in mortality (odds ratio, 0.76; 95% credible interval, 0.58 to 0.95) and a 51% reduction in reinfarction (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% credible interval, 0.32 to 0.66) in RCTs. However, there was no conclusive benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the long term in the observational studies.
Conclusions— Compared with fibrinolytic therapy, primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with short-term reductions in mortality, reinfarction, and stroke in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with long-term reductions in mortality and reinfarction in RCTs, but there was no conclusive evidence for a long-term benefit in mortality and reinfarction in observational studies.
Related Articles:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. W.A. Verheugt Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Trials, Registries, and Guidelines Circulation, June 23, 2009; 119(24): 3047 - 3049. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |