Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:2920-2927
Published online before print May 26, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.823211
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/22/2920    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.823211v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pengo, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pengo, V.
Related Collections
Right arrow Arterial thrombosis
Right arrow Deep vein thrombosis
Right arrow Heparin
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrow Thrombosis risk factors
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:2920-2927.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Vascular Medicine

Standardized Low–Molecular-Weight Heparin Bridging Regimen in Outpatients on Oral Anticoagulants Undergoing Invasive Procedure or Surgery

An Inception Cohort Management Study

V. Pengo, MD; U. Cucchini, MD; G. Denas, MD; N. Erba, MD; G. Guazzaloca, MD; L. La Rosa, MD; V. De Micheli, MD; S. Testa, MD; R. Frontoni, MD; D. Prisco, MD; G. Nante, MD; S. Iliceto, MD, for the Italian Federation of Centers for the Diagnosis of Thrombosis and Management of Antithrombotic Therapies (FCSA)

From the Clinical Cardiology, Thrombosis Center, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova School of Medicine, Padova (P.V., C.U., D.G., I.S.); Merate General Hospital, Lecco (E.N.); University Hospital, Bologna (G.G.); General Hospital, Vimercate (L.L.); General Hospital, Lecco (D.V.); General Hospital, Cremona (T.S.); General Hospital, Macerata (F.R.); University of Firenze, Firenze (P.D.); and Geriatric Clinic, Padova (N.G.), Italy.

Correspondence to Vittorio Pengo, MD, Clinical Cardiology, Thrombosis Center, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. E-mail vittorio.pengo{at}unipd.it

Received October 7, 2008; accepted April 10, 2009.

Background— Bridging therapy with low–molecular-weight heparin is usually recommended in patients who must stop oral anticoagulants before surgical or invasive procedures. To date, there is no universally accepted bridging regimen tailored to the patient’s thromboembolic risk. This prospective inception cohort management study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an individualized bridging protocol applied to outpatients.

Methods and Results— Oral anticoagulants were stopped 5 days before the procedure. Low–molecular-weight heparin was started 3 to 4 days before surgery and continued for 6 days after surgery at 70 anti–factor Xa U/kg twice daily in high-thromboembolic-risk patients and prophylactic once-daily doses in moderate- to low-risk patients. Oral anticoagulation was resumed the day after the procedure with a boost dose of 50% for 2 days and maintenance doses afterward. The patients were followed up for 30 days. Of the 1262 patients included in the study (only 15% had mechanical valves), 295 (23.4%) were high-thromboembolic-risk patients and 967 (76.6%) were moderate- to low-risk patients. In the intention-to-treat analysis, there were 5 thromboembolic events (0.4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 0.9), all in high-thromboembolic-risk patients. There were 15 major (1.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.7 to 2.0) and 53 minor (4.2%; 95% confidence interval, 3.2 to 5.5) bleeding episodes. Major bleeding was associated with twice-daily low–molecular-weight heparin administration (high-risk patients) but not with the bleeding risk of the procedure.

Conclusions— This management bridging protocol, tailored to patients’ thromboembolic risk, appears to be feasible, effective, and safe for many patients, but safety in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves has not been conclusively established.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE


Related Article:

Circulation: Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 119: 2861-2862. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
Authors/Task Force Members, D. Poldermans, J. J. Bax, E. Boersma, S. De Hert, E. Eeckhout, G. Fowkes, B. Gorenek, M. G. Hennerici, B. Iung, et al.
Guidelines for pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in non-cardiac surgery: The Task Force for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA)
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2769 - 2812.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Invasive Procedures in Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants
Journal Watch Cardiology, July 15, 2009; 2009(715): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]