| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2008;118:346-354.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Exercise Physiology |
From the Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging (A.E.T., Ø.R., T.O.S., A.B., P.M.H., J.P.L., S.A.S., U.W.) and Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine (E.S.), Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology and the Center for Diabetes and Endocrine Research, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio (S.J.L., Q.Y.A.-S., S.M.N.); Department of Cardiology (J.P.L., S.A.S., U.W.) and Anaesthesia and Emergency Medicine (E.S.), St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; and Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK (O.J.K.).
Correspondence to Ulrik Wisløff, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Medical Technology Research Center, Olav Kyrres Gate 9, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail ulrik.wisloff{at}ntnu.no
Received October 25, 2007; accepted May 27, 2008.
Background— Individuals with the metabolic syndrome are 3 times more likely to die of heart disease than healthy counterparts. Exercise training reduces several of the symptoms of the syndrome, but the exercise intensity that yields the maximal beneficial adaptations is in dispute. We compared moderate and high exercise intensity with regard to variables associated with cardiovascular function and prognosis in patients with the metabolic syndrome.
Methods and Results— Thirty-two metabolic syndrome patients (age, 52.3±3.7 years; maximal oxygen uptake [
O2max], 34 mL · kg–1 · min–1) were randomized to equal volumes of either moderate continuous moderate exercise (CME; 70% of highest measured heart rate [Hfmax]) or aerobic interval training (AIT; 90% of Hfmax) 3 times a week for 16 weeks or to a control group.
O2max increased more after AIT than CME (35% versus 16%; P<0.01) and was associated with removal of more risk factors that constitute the metabolic syndrome (number of factors: AIT, 5.9 before versus 4.0 after; P<0.01; CME, 5.7 before versus 5.0 after; group difference, P<0.05). AIT was superior to CME in enhancing endothelial function (9% versus 5%; P<0.001), insulin signaling in fat and skeletal muscle, skeletal muscle biogenesis, and excitation-contraction coupling and in reducing blood glucose and lipogenesis in adipose tissue. The 2 exercise programs were equally effective at lowering mean arterial blood pressure and reducing body weight (–2.3 and –3.6 kg in AIT and CME, respectively) and fat.
Conclusions— Exercise intensity was an important factor for improving aerobic capacity and reversing the risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. These findings may have important implications for exercise training in rehabilitation programs and future studies.
Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. O. Stolen, M. A. Hoydal, O. J. Kemi, D. Catalucci, M. Ceci, E. Aasum, T. Larsen, N. Rolim, G. Condorelli, G. L. Smith, et al. Interval Training Normalizes Cardiomyocyte Function, Diastolic Ca2+ Control, and SR Ca2+ Release Synchronicity in a Mouse Model of Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Circ. Res., September 11, 2009; 105(6): 527 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Aizawa, J. K. Shoemaker, T. J. Overend, and R. J. Petrella Metabolic syndrome, endothelial function and lifestyle modification Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, July 1, 2009; 6(3): 181 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Marwick, M. D. Hordern, T. Miller, D. A. Chyun, A. G. Bertoni, R. S. Blumenthal, G. Philippides, A. Rocchini, and on behalf of the American Heart Association Exerci Exercise Training for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Impact on Cardiovascular Risk: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Circulation, June 30, 2009; 119(25): 3244 - 3262. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Poelkens, M. T.E. Hopman, and C. C. Tack Letter by Poelkens et al Regarding Article, "Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Moderate Exercise as a Treatment for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Pilot Study" Circulation, March 3, 2009; 119(8): e225 - e225. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Tjonna, O. Rognmo, T. Stolen, A. Bye, P. M. Haram, J. P. Loennechen, S. A. Slordahl, U. Wisloff, S. J. Lee, Q. Y. Al-Share, et al. Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Aerobic Interval Training Versus Continuous Moderate Exercise as a Treatment for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Pilot Study" Circulation, March 3, 2009; 119(8): e226 - e226. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Haram, O. J. Kemi, S. J. Lee, M. O. Bendheim, Q. Y. Al-Share, H. L. Waldum, L. J. Gilligan, L. G. Koch, S. L. Britton, S. M. Najjar, et al. Aerobic interval training vs. continuous moderate exercise in the metabolic syndrome of rats artificially selected for low aerobic capacity Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2009; 81(4): 723 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |