This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Windecker, S. Articles by Meier, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Windecker, S. Articles by Meier, B. Related Collections Deep vein thrombosis Echocardiography Acute Cerebral Infarction Brain Circulation and Metabolism Risk Factors for Stroke Anticoagulants Antiplatelets

(Circulation. 2008;118:1989-1997.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine

Is closure recommended for patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke?

Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: To Close or Not to Close? Closure: What Else!

Stephan Windecker, MD; Bernhard Meier, MD

From the Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Stephan Windecker, MD, Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail stephan.windecker@insel.ch

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

	Introduction

 
A 39-year-old mother of 2 teenage boys complained of severe migraine with aura for >10 years. Otherwise healthy, she suffered an ischemic stroke that rendered her permanently aphasic. Diagnostic evaluation revealed no evidence of atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries or plaques of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch. The ECG showed normal sinus rhythm, and the patient denied any history of palpitations or arrhythmias. Echocardiography documented normal ventricular function without wall motion abnormalities or evidence of thrombus and normal-appearing valves but a large patent foramen ovale (PFO). The most likely clinical diagnosis is stroke due to paradoxical embolism. The patient’s neurologist recommended PFO closure. However, guidelines regarding PFO closure from professional societies remain ambiguous because of insufficient evidence regarding therapeutic measures (Table 1).^1,2

View this table:   Table 1. Guidelines From Professional Societies1,2

Response by Messé and Kasner p 1998

Stroke is the third leading cause of mortality and the most important cause of serious, long-term disability in developed countries.³ The presented case is testimony to the sad sequelae of stroke that may deprive someone permanently of speech, an emotional and mental tragedy. A classic etiology is not found in up to 40% of ischemic strokes despite an extensive diagnostic evaluation. This is referred to as cryptogenic stroke, a term that strangely ignores the role of the PFO.⁴ The foramen ovale is an opening in the atrial septum secundum, with the septum primum functioning as a 1-way valve allowing right-to-left shunt during in utero development. The postnatal decrease in right . . . [Full Text of this Article]