This Article Free upon publication Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Circulation: October 14, 2008, Volume 118, Number 16 Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 118/16/1626    most recent CIRCULATIONAHA.108.791061v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wiviott, S. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiviott, S. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Medline Plus Health Information Blood Thinners Diabetes Diabetes Type 1 Heart Attack Hazardous Substances DB THIOPHENE Related Collections Secondary prevention Platelet function inhibitors Type 2 diabetes Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents Acute coronary syndromes Oxidant stress

(Circulation. 2008;118:1626-1636.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Coronary Heart Disease

Greater Clinical Benefit of More Intensive Oral Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38

Stephen D. Wiviott, MD; Eugene Braunwald, MD; Dominick J. Angiolillo, MD, PhD; Simha Meisel, MD; Anthony J. Dalby, MD; Freek W.A. Verheugt, MD; Shaun G. Goodman, MD; Ramon Corbalan, MD; Drew A. Purdy, MD; Sabina A. Murphy, MPH; Carolyn H. McCabe, BS; Elliott M. Antman, MD, for the TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators

From the TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (S.D.W., E.B., S.A.M. C.H.M., E.M.A.); University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville (D.J.A.); Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel (S.M.); St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, and Canadian Heart Research Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (S.G.G.); Millpark Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa (A.J.D.); Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (F.W.A.V.); Department of Cardiology, Catholic University School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (R.C.); and Black Hills Cardiovascular Research Group, Black Hills, SD (D.A.P.).

Reprint requests to Dr S.D. Wiviott, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail swiviott{at}partners.org

Received May 7, 2008; accepted August 7, 2008.

Background— Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes, in part because of increased platelet reactivity. The Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38) showed an overall reduction in ischemic events with more intensive antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel than with clopidogrel but with more bleeding. We compared prasugrel with clopidogrel among subjects with DM in TRITON-TIMI 38.

Methods and Results— We classified 13 608 subjects on the basis of preexisting history of DM and further according to insulin use. Prespecified analyses of the primary (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) and key secondary end points, including net clinical benefit (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and nonfatal TIMI major bleeding) were compared by use of the log-rank test. We found that 3146 subjects had a preexisting history of DM, including 776 receiving insulin. The primary end point was reduced significantly with prasugrel among subjects without DM (9.2% versus 10.6%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; P=0.02) and with DM (12.2% versus 17.0%; HR, 0.70; P<0.001, P_interaction=0.09). A benefit for prasugrel was observed among DM subjects on insulin (14.3% versus 22.2%; HR, 0.63; P=0.009) and those not on insulin (11.5% versus 15.3%; HR, 0.74; P=0.009). Myocardial infarction was reduced with prasugrel by 18% among subjects without DM (7.2% versus 8.7%; HR, 0.82; P=0.006) and by 40% among subjects with DM (8.2% versus 13.2%; HR, 0.60; P<0.001, P_interaction=0.02). Although TIMI major hemorrhage was increased among subjects without DM on prasugrel (1.6% versus 2.4%; HR, 1.43; P=0.02), the rates were similar among subjects with DM for clopidogrel and prasugrel (2.6% versus 2.5%; HR, 1.06; P=0.81, P_interaction=0.29). Net clinical benefit with prasugrel was greater for subjects with DM (14.6% versus 19.2%; HR, 0.74; P=0.001) than for subjects without DM (11.5% versus 12.3%; HR, 0.92; P=0.16, P_interaction=0.05).

Conclusions— Subjects with DM tended to have a greater reduction in ischemic events without an observed increase in TIMI major bleeding and therefore a greater net treatment benefit with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel. These data demonstrate that the more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy provided with prasugrel is of particular benefit to patients with DM.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F.-J. Neumann Balancing efficacy and safety in the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2009; 11(suppl_G): G14 - G17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Montalescot Benefits for specific subpopulations in TRITON-TIMI 38 Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2009; 11(suppl_G): G18 - G24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Calkin, B. G. Drew, A. Ono, S. J. Duffy, M. V. Gordon, S. M. Schoenwaelder, D. Sviridov, M. E. Cooper, B. A. Kingwell, and S. P. Jackson Reconstituted High-Density Lipoprotein Attenuates Platelet Function in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus by Promoting Cholesterol Efflux Circulation, November 24, 2009; 120(21): 2095 - 2104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Montalescot, J.-S. Hulot, and J.-P. Collet Stent thrombosis: who's guilty? Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2009; 30(22): 2685 - 2688. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. P. Giugliano and E. Braunwald The Year in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 13, 2009; 54(16): 1544 - 1555. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Lasala, D. A. Cox, D. Dobies, K. Baran, W. B. Bachinsky, E. W. Rogers, J. A. Breall, D. H. Lewis, A. Song, R. M. Starzyk, et al. Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis in Routine Clinical Practice: Two-Year Outcomes and Predictors From the TAXUS ARRIVE Registries Circ Cardiovasc Interv, August 1, 2009; 2(4): 285 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Rosenstein and D. Parra Letter by Rosenstein and Parra Regarding Article, "Greater Clinical Benefit of More Intensive Oral Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38" Circulation, June 30, 2009; 119(25): e601 - e601. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Wiviott, E. Braunwald, S. A. Murphy, C. H. McCabe, E. M. Antman, D. J. Angiolillo, S. Meisel, A. J. Dalby, F. W.A. Verheugt, S. G. Goodman, et al. Response to Letter Regarding Article, "Greater Clinical Benefit of More Intensive Oral Antiplatelet Therapy With Prasugrel in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel: Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38" Circulation, June 30, 2009; 119(25): e602 - e603. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Leon, D. J. Allocco, K. D. Dawkins, and D. S. Baim Late Clinical Events After Drug-Eluting Stents: The Interplay Between Stent-Related and Natural History-Driven Events J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 504 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tousoulis, A. Briasoulis, S. S Dhamrait, C. Antoniades, and C. Stefanadis Effective platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel: where are we now? Heart, May 1, 2009; 95(10): 850 - 858. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Sanz, P. R. Moreno, and V. Fuster The Year in Atherothrombosis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 14, 2009; 53(15): 1326 - 1337. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Angiolillo Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetes: Efficacy and Limitations of Current Treatment Strategies and Future Directions Diabetes Care, April 1, 2009; 32(4): 531 - 540. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. S. SABATINE Novel antiplatelet strategies in acute coronary syndromes Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, April 1, 2009; 76(Suppl_1): S8 - S15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Scott, R. M Norwood, and D. Parra P2Y12 Inhibitors in Cardiovascular Disease: Focus on Prasugrel Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2009; 43(1): 64 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Diabetes: More Is Better Journal Watch Cardiology, December 3, 2008; 2008(1203): 6 - 6. [Full Text]

				V. Fuster and M. E. Farkouh Acute Coronary Syndromes and Diabetes Mellitus: A Winning Ticket for Prasugrel Circulation, October 14, 2008; 118(16): 1607 - 1608. [Full Text] [PDF]