This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sabik, J. F. Articles by Loop, F. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sabik, J. F., III Articles by Loop, F. D. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Coronary Artery Disease Related Collections CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2008;118:S210-S215.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.

Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease

Does Location of the Second Internal Thoracic Artery Graft Influence Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting?

Joseph F. Sabik, III, MD; Aleck Stockins, MD; Edward R. Nowicki, MD, MS; Eugene H. Blackstone, MD; Penny L. Houghtaling, MS; Bruce W. Lytle, MD; Floyd D. Loop, MD

From the Departments of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (J.F.S., A.S., E.R.N., E.H.B., B.W.L., F.D.L.) and Quantitative Health Sciences (E.H.B., P.L.H.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Correspondence to Joseph F. Sabik III, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue/Desk F24, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail sabikj{at}ccf.org

Background— We sought to determine whether location of the second internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft used for bilateral ITA grafting affects mortality and morbidity of patients with 3-system coronary artery disease and to identify factors associated with second ITA location.

Methods and Results— From January 1972 to June 2006, 3611 patients with 3-system coronary artery disease underwent bilateral ITA grafting with one graft anastomosed to the left anterior descending system and the second to either the circumflex (n=2926) or right coronary artery (n=685) system. Follow-up was 9.2±7.2 years. Propensity score methodology was used to obtain risk-adjusted outcome comparisons between patients with the second ITA to circumflex versus right coronary artery. Hospital mortality (0.34% versus 0.58%; P=0.4), stroke (0.96% versus 0.88%; P=0.8), myocardial infarction (1.3% versus 0.73%; P=0.2), renal failure (0.44% versus 0.29%; P=0.6), respiratory insufficiency (3.5% versus 3.8%; P=0.7), and reoperation for bleeding (3.4% versus 3.2%; P=0.8) were similar in patients who received the second ITA to circumflex or right coronary artery and remained similar after propensity score adjustment. Late survival (86% versus 87% at 10 years) was also similar. Despite this, there was a gradual decline in ITA to right coronary artery grafting.

Conclusions— Contrary to prevailing wisdom that the second ITA graft should be anastomosed to the next most important left-sided coronary artery in 3-system coronary artery disease, it may be placed to either the circumflex or right coronary artery system with similar early and late outcomes.

Key Words: coronary disease • revascularization • risk factors • surgery • survival