Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:3134-3144
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.761759
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregoratos, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gregoratos, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
*Heart Diseases
Related Collections
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 2008;117:3134-3144.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine

Are the current perioperative risk management strategies for myocardial infarction flawed?

Current Guideline-Based Preoperative Evaluation Provides the Best Management of Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Gabriel Gregoratos, AB, MD

From the University of California at San Francisco.

Correspondence to Gabriel Gregoratos, AB, MD, 505 Parnassus Ave, M-314, Box 0214, San Francisco, CA 94143–0214. E-mail gpggrego@medicine.ucsf.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
This report will review the 2007 revision of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery,1 examine the rationale of the recommendations put forth, and attempt to clarify certain recommendations in the context of optimal patient care.

Response by Brett p 3144


*    The Problem
 
The volume of noncardiac surgery has progressively increased over the past 2 decades2 to levels exceeding prior predictions,3 with elderly patients undergoing at least 4 million major noncardiac operations annually.4 Given the high prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD), it is not surprising that cardiac complications are a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Cardiac complications occur in 1% to 5% of unselected patients undergoing vascular surgery.3,5 Of the 27 million patients undergoing anesthesia annually, 50 000 suffer a perioperative myocardial infarction (MI).6 The recently published universal definition of MI7 has broadened the definition of MI and will likely result in a further increase of perioperatively diagnosed MIs and affect long-term management and prognosis.8 As a result, consultations for preoperative evaluation and assistance in perioperative management are frequently requested of cardiologists, internists, and generalists by surgeons and anesthesiologists. The guidelines emphasize that the consultant should not only offer opinions regarding the operative risk and advice on perioperative management but should use this opportunity to recommend treatments that will affect long-term patient outcomes.

This report will focus entirely on preoperative risk assessment and management of patients with known or potential CHD, the major cause of perioperative cardiac . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal Watch Hospital MedicineHome page
Current Guidelines for Preoperative Management Leave Me Wanting More
Journal Watch Hospital Medicine, August 25, 2008; 2008(825): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]