Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:2395-2399
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.682658
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaValley, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LaValley, M. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2008;117:2395-2399.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Statistical Primer for Cardiovascular Research

Logistic Regression

Michael P. LaValley, PhD

From the Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Dr Michael P. LaValley, Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Crosstown Center Room 322, Boston, MA 02118. E-mail mlava@bu.edu


Key Words: angina • epidemiology • risk factors • statistics


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Like contingency table analyses and {chi}2 tests, logistic regression allows the analysis of dichotomous or binary outcomes with 2 mutually exclusive levels.1 However, logistic regression permits the use of continuous or categorical predictors and provides the ability to adjust for multiple predictors. This makes logistic regression especially useful for analysis of observational data when adjustment is needed to reduce the potential bias resulting from differences in the groups being compared.2

Use of standard linear regression for a 2-level outcome can produce very unsatisfactory results. Predicted values for some covariate values are likely to be either above the upper level (usually 1) or below the lower level of the outcome (usually 0). In addition, the validity of linear regression depends on the variability of the outcome being the same for all values of the predictors. This assumption of constant variability does not match the behavior of a 2-level outcome. So, linear regression is not adequate for such data, and logistic regression has been developed to fill this gap.

Some recent examples of use of logistic regression in Circulation include the assessment of gender as a predictor of operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery,3 an evaluation of the relationship between the TaqlB genotype and risk of cardiovascular disease in a meta-analysis,4 and an examination of the relationship between lipoprotein abnormalities and the incidence of diabetes.5


*    The Logistic Regression Model
 
The logistic regression model has its basis in the odds of a 2-level outcome of interest. For simplicity, I assume that we have designated one of . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Leonardi, C. Raineri, G. M. De Ferrari, S. Ghio, L. Scelsi, M. Pasotti, M. Tagliani, A. Valentini, R. Dore, A. Raisaro, et al.
Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance in assessing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2009; 30(16): 2003 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. E. Freedland, R. L. Reese, and B. C. Steinmeyer
Multivariable Models in Biobehavioral Research
Psychosom Med, February 1, 2009; 71(2): 205 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]