Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2008;117:1603-1608
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.752261
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto Slottow, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Waksman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto Slottow, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Waksman, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 2008;117:1603-1608.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


New Drugs and Technologies

Overview of the 2007 Food and Drug Administration Circulatory System Devices Panel Meeting on the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent

Tina L. Pinto Slottow, MD; Ron Waksman, MD

From the Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to Ron Waksman, MD, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Ste 4B-1, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail ron.waksman@medstar.net


Key Words: drug-eluting stents • heart disease • atherosclerosis


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Initial trials comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty demonstrated improved angiographic and clinical outcomes with the former.1–3 The main clinical problem with bare metal stents (BMS) became the development of in-stent restenosis.4–6 Early data suggested that drug-eluting stents (DES) could mitigate, if not abolish, this problem.7–9 Since the approval of DES, these devices have become the predominant stents used in percutaneous coronary interventions, regardless of indication. As of September 2007, the Cypher sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) (Cordis Johnson & Johnson, Miami Lakes, Fla) had been deployed in >3 million patients worldwide,10 and the millionth Taxus paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) was implanted as of January 2005.11 Over the past 2 years, numerous reports of very late stent thrombosis (ST) with first-generation DES have surfaced. This highly morbid complication and data suggesting that death and myocardial infarction (MI) may be more common with DES12,13 have altered the focus of trials and registries working to determine optimal DES use.

There is a hope that second-generation DES will be less prone to ST as a result of differences in drug, stent design, and polymer. Medtronic, Inc (Minneapolis, Minn) presented safety and efficacy data to a public meeting of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Circulatory System Devices Panel (CSDP) in October 2007 on its Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES), seeking approval for the indication of treating de novo native coronary lesions ≤27 mm with reference vessel diameters of 2.5 to 3.5 mm. The FDA asked the CSDP to determine whether the data presented . . . [Full Text of this Article]