This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brindis, R. G. Articles by Spertus, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brindis, R. G. Articles by Spertus, J. A. Related Collections Health policy and outcome research Congestive Acute myocardial infarction

(Circulation. 2007;116:2238-2240.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorial

Specialty Cardiac Hospitals

How Special Are They?

Ralph G. Brindis, MD, MPH; John A. Spertus, MD, MPH

From the Oakland Kaiser Medical Center (R.G.B.), Oakland, Calif; and Mid-America Heart Institute (J.A.S.), Kansas City, Mo.

Correspondence to Dr Ralph G. Brindis, 280 West MacArthur Blvd, Oakland, CA 94611. E-mail: Ralph.Brindis@kp.org

Key Words: Editorials • cardiovascular diseases • coronary disease • heart failure • hospitals, special

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

	Introduction

 
Specialty hospitals, owned and operated by physicians with an expertise in a particular medical condition, offer the opportunity to design a utopian care environment for optimal delivery of care. In fact, the concept of specialty heart hospitals dates back to the mid-19th century in England, with the opening in 1857 of London’s National Hospital for Diseases of the Heart and Paralysis. The institution of specialty hospitals in the United States underwent acceleration by the mid-1990’s.¹ Many confluent factors explain the development of specialty cardiac hospitals in the United States, including significant advances in cardiovascular technology, dramatic increases in the cost (and profitability) of cardiovascular care, and, most important, the perceived financial constraints on both hospitals and practicing physicians from health plans and payers, which results in a perception of reduced practice autonomy by physicians and hospitals.^2,3 Presently, >100 specialty hospitals exist in the United States, with many focusing on cardiac care. Although specialty hospitals have the potential to improve care by focusing considerable clinical expertise and resources for the care of a limited spectrum of disease, empirical evidence that demonstrates improved outcomes is minimal or potentially biased because of challenges of adequate risk adjustment for the somewhat debated presence of lower-risk patients treated by specialty hospitals compared with their general hospital counterparts.^4–6

Article p 2280

In the absence of substantial data justifying better outcomes, or detailed economic analyses of value, significant issues surrounding specialty cardiac hospitals include⁷: (1) Do specialized facilities lower costs, increase quality, or both? (2) Do . . . [Full Text of this Article]