Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:I-270-I-275
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.680314
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2007;116:I-270 – I-275.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Endoscopic Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery After Previous Cardiac Surgery

Filip P. Casselman, MD, PhD, FETCS; Mark La Meir, MD; Hughes Jeanmart, MD; Enzo Mazzarro, MD; Jose Coddens, MD; Frank Van Praet, MD; Francis Wellens, MD; Yvette Vermeulen, MSc; Hugo Vanermen, MD, FETCS

From the Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, OLV Clinic, Aalst, Belgium.

Correspondence to Filip P. Casselman, MD, PhD, FETCS, Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, OLV Clinic, Moorselbaan 164, 9300 AALST, Belgium. E-mail filip.casselman{at}olvz-aalst.be

Background— The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a right video-assisted approach for atrioventricular valve disease after previous cardiac surgery.

Methods and Results— Between December 1st 1997 and May 1st 2006, 80 adults (mean age 65±12 years; 56% female) underwent reoperative surgery using a video-assisted approach without rib spreading. Previous cardiac operations included mitral valve (39%), CABG (29%), congenital (10%), and other (23%). For 25% of patients, this was at least their third cardiac operation. Mean time to redo surgery was 15±12 years. Femoral vessel cannulation and endoaortic clamping were routinely used. Mean preoperative Euroscore was 9.0±2.7 (5 to 20) and predicted mortality was 16.0±14.2% (4 to 86). Median preoperative NYHA class was II and mean follow-up was 25±22 months. Lung adhesions necessitated sternotomy in 4 cases and cannulation problems in another patient. Total operative mortality was 3.8% (n=3), O/E for mortality being 0.24. Procedures were mitral valve repair (45%; n=36), replacement (50%; n=40) and tricuspid valve replacement (5%; n=4). Additional procedures were performed in 44% (n=35). Mean aortic crossclamp and procedure time were 92±37 and 267±64 minutes. Mean postoperative blood loss was 815±1083 mL. Postoperative morbidity included 2 strokes (2.5%). Mean hospital stay was 10.7±6.7 days. Survival at 1 and 4 years was 93.6±2.8% and 85.6±6.4%. There was 1 late reoperation at 5 years. Median NYHA class at follow-up was II. When comparing, all but 1 patient (98.8%) preferred their minimally invasive approach when considering perioperative pain, postoperative rehabilitation, and final esthetic result.

Conclusions— Video-assisted minimal access correction of atrioventricular valve disease after previous cardiac surgery is not only feasible but had lower than predicted mortality and strong patient satisfaction. It should therefore be used more frequently in today’s practice.


Key Words: mitral valve • tricuspid valve • surgery • reoperation • endoscopic