Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.688101
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Henzlova, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Einstein, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Henzlova, M. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diagnostic Imaging
Related Collections
Right arrow Quantitative modeling
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET

(Circulation. 2007;116:1290-1305.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Contemporary Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine

Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging

Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD; Kevin W. Moser, PhD; Randall C. Thompson, MD; Manuel D. Cerqueira, MD; Milena J. Henzlova, MD, PhD

From the Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, and the Department of Radiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY (A.J.E.); Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pa (K.W.M.); Cardiovascular Consultants, PC, and Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Mo (R.C.T.); Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (M.D.C.); and Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (M.J.H.).

Correspondence to Andrew J. Einstein, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, PH 10-408, New York, NY 10032. E-mail andrew.einstein@columbia.edu


Key Words: angiography • radioisotopes • computerized tomography, x-ray • radiation dosimetry • safety


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
The volume of cardiac diagnostic procedures involving the use of ionizing radiation has increased rapidly in recent years. Whereas in 1990, fewer than 3 million nuclear cardiology studies were performed in the United States, by 2002 this figure more than tripled to 9.9 million.1 Cardiac computed tomographic (CT) volume doubled between 2002 and 2003, to 485 000 cases,2 and has continued to grow since then. The volume of procedures performed in cardiac catheterization labs increased from 2.45 million in 1993 to 3.85 million in 2002.3

The powerful diagnostic and risk-stratification data provided by these procedures play a central role in clinical cardiology and have contributed to the decrease in morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease. Nevertheless, performance of any diagnostic test requires a careful assessment of the risks and benefits of the test and optimization of protocols to minimize risks to patients, staff members, and the public. Procedures that utilize ionizing radiation should be performed in accordance with the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) philosophy. Thus, physicians ordering and performing cardiac imaging should be very familiar with the dosage of radiation from cardiac diagnostic tests and ways in which dose can be minimized. In this report we discuss the measurement of radiation and the dosimetry of commonly performed cardiac diagnostic imaging tests, including nuclear scintigraphy, CT for calcium scoring and coronary angiography (CTCA), and conventional coronary angiography (CCA). For each modality, we address the terminology and methodology used to quantify radiation received by patients, doses to patients with . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Iskandrian
Stress-Only Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: A New Paradigm
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2009; (2009) j.jacc.2009.10.007v1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. M. Chang, F. Nabi, J. Xu, U. Raza, and J. J. Mahmarian
Normal Stress-Only Versus Standard Stress/Rest Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Similar Patient Mortality With Reduced Radiation Exposure
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2009; (2009) j.jacc.2009.09.022v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J Peteiro and A Bouzas-Mosquera
Chest pain in the emergency department: role of cardiac imaging
Heart, November 1, 2009; 95(21): 1802 - 1802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. J. Shaw, R. Bugiardini, and C. N. B. Merz
Women and ischemic heart disease: evolving knowledge.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 20, 2009; 54(17): 1561 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
B A Herzog, C A Wyss, L Husmann, O Gaemperli, I Valenta, V Treyer, U Landmesser, and P A Kaufmann
First head-to-head comparison of effective radiation dose from low-dose 64-slice CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus invasive coronary angiography
Heart, October 15, 2009; 95(20): 1656 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. Blankstein, L. D. Shturman, I. S. Rogers, J. A. Rocha-Filho, D. R. Okada, A. Sarwar, A. V. Soni, H. Bezerra, B. B. Ghoshhajra, M. Petranovic, et al.
Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 15, 2009; 54(12): 1072 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K-R Chiou, W-C Huang, N-J Peng, Y-L Huang, S-H Hsiao, K-H Chen, and M-T Wu
Dual-phase multi-detector computed tomography assesses jeopardised and infarcted myocardium subtending infarct-related artery early after acute myocardial infarction
Heart, September 15, 2009; 95(18): 1495 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
M. Salerno and G. A. Beller
Noninvasive Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2009; 2(5): 412 - 424.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Husmann, B. A. Herzog, N. Burkhard, I. Valenta, I. A. Burger, O. Gaemperli, and P. A. Kaufmann
Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography With Prospective ECG Triggering: Validation of a Contrast Material Protocol Adapted to Body Mass Index
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 802 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Fazel, H. M. Krumholz, Y. Wang, J. S. Ross, J. Chen, H. H. Ting, N. D. Shah, K. Nasir, A. J. Einstein, and B. K. Nallamothu
Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures
N. Engl. J. Med., August 27, 2009; 361(9): 849 - 857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Pontone, D. Andreini, A. L. Bartorelli, S. Cortinovis, S. Mushtaq, E. Bertella, A. Annoni, A. Formenti, E. Nobili, D. Trabattoni, et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram triggering.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2009; 54(4): 346 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
N. Bettencourt, J. Rocha, M. Carvalho, D. Leite, A. M. Toschke, B. Melica, L. Santos, A. Rodrigues, M. Goncalves, P. Braga, et al.
Multislice Computed Tomography in the Exclusion of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Presurgical Valve Disease
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, July 1, 2009; 2(4): 306 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. C. Weustink, N. R. Mollet, L. A. Neefjes, M. van Straten, E. Neoh, S. Kyrzopoulos, B. W. Meijboom, C. van Mieghem, F. Cademartiri, P. J. de Feyter, et al.
Preserved Diagnostic Performance of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography with Reduced Radiation Exposure and Cancer Risk
Radiology, July 1, 2009; 252(1): 53 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. M. Bengel, T. Higuchi, M. S. Javadi, and R. Lautamaki
Cardiac positron emission tomography.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 30, 2009; 54(1): 1 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. L. Raff, K. M. Chinnaiyan, D. A. Share, T. Y. Goraya, E. A. Kazerooni, M. Moscucci, R. E. Gentry, A. Abidov, and for the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium
Radiation Dose From Cardiac Computed Tomography Before and After Implementation of Radiation Dose-Reduction Techniques
JAMA, June 10, 2009; 301(22): 2340 - 2348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
U. Hoffmann, F. Bamberg, C. U. Chae, J. H. Nichols, I. S. Rogers, S. K. Seneviratne, Q. A. Truong, R. C. Cury, S. Abbara, M. D. Shapiro, et al.
Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2009; 53(18): 1642 - 1650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
U. Hoffmann and F. Bamberg
Is Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool to Evaluate Patients With Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department?: CT Coronary Angiography Is the Most Accurate and Effective Noninvasive Imaging Tool for Evaluating Patients Presenting With Chest Pain to the Emergency Department
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 251 - 263.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
D. Andreini, G. Pontone, A. L. Bartorelli, P. Agostoni, S. Mushtaq, E. Bertella, D. Trabattoni, G. Cattadori, S. Cortinovis, A. Annoni, et al.
Sixty-Four-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography: An Accurate Imaging Modality for the Evaluation of Coronary Arteries in Dilated Cardiomyopathy of Unknown Etiology
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, May 1, 2009; 2(3): 199 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
D. S. Berman, X. Kang, B. Tamarappoo, A. Wolak, S. W. Hayes, R. Nakazato, L. E.J. Thomson, F. Kite, I. Cohen, P. J. Slomka, et al.
Stress Thallium-201/Rest Technetium-99m Sequential Dual Isotope High-Speed Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 273 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
A. J. Einstein
Breaking America's Dependence on Imported Molybdenum.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 369 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. Husmann, B. A. Herzog, O. Gaemperli, F. Tatsugami, N. Burkhard, I. Valenta, P. Veit-Haibach, C. A. Wyss, U. Landmesser, and P. A. Kaufmann
Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2009; 30(5): 600 - 607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
P. Kaul and P. S. Douglas
Atherosclerosis Imaging: Prognostically Useful or Merely More of What We Know?
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2009; 2(2): 150 - 160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Tatsugami, L. Husmann, B. A. Herzog, N. Burkhard, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, and P. A. Kaufmann
Evaluation of a Body Mass Index-Adapted Protocol for Low-Dose 64-MDCT Coronary Angiography with Prospective ECG Triggering
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 635 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. C. Gerber, J. J. Carr, A. E. Arai, R. L. Dixon, V. A. Ferrari, A. S. Gomes, G. V. Heller, C. H. McCollough, M. F. McNitt-Gray, F. A. Mettler, et al.
Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1056 - 1065.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Hausleiter, T. Meyer, F. Hermann, M. Hadamitzky, M. Krebs, T. C. Gerber, C. McCollough, S. Martinoff, A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, et al.
Estimated Radiation Dose Associated With Cardiac CT Angiography
JAMA, February 4, 2009; 301(5): 500 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. J. Einstein
Radiation Protection of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Computed Tomographic Angiography
JAMA, February 4, 2009; 301(5): 545 - 547.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
A. Holz, R. Lautamaki, T. Sasano, J. Merrill, S. G. Nekolla, A. C. Lardo, and F. M. Bengel
Expanding the Versatility of Cardiac PET/CT: Feasibility of Delayed Contrast Enhancement CT for Infarct Detection in a Porcine Model
J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 259 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Gibbons, P. A. Araoz, and E. E. Williamson
The year in cardiac imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 6, 2009; 53(1): 54 - 70.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
C. Kriatselis, M. Tang, M. Roser, E. Fleck, and H. Gerds-Li
A new approach for contrast-enhanced X-ray imaging of the left atrium and pulmonary veins for atrial fibrillation ablation: rotational angiography during adenosine-induced asystole
Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
B. A. Herzog, L. Husmann, N. Burkhard, O. Gaemperli, I. Valenta, F. Tatsugami, C. A. Wyss, U. Landmesser, and P. A. Kaufmann
Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2008; 29(24): 3037 - 3042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
A. J Einstein
Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?
Heart, December 1, 2008; 94(12): 1519 - 1521.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc ImagingHome page
R. J. Gibbons
Noninvasive Diagnosis and Prognosis Assessment in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease: Stress Testing With and Without Imaging Perspective
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, November 1, 2008; 1(3): 257 - 269.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. G. Stabin
Radiopharmaceuticals for Nuclear Cardiology: Radiation Dosimetry, Uncertainties, and Risk
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1555 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. C. Weustink, N. R. Mollet, F. Pugliese, W. B. Meijboom, K. Nieman, M. H. Heijenbrok-Kal, T. G. Flohr, L. A. E. Neefjes, F. Cademartiri, P. J. de Feyter, et al.
Optimal Electrocardiographic Pulsing Windows and Heart Rate: Effect on Image Quality and Radiation Exposure at Dual-Source Coronary CT Angiography
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 792 - 798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G BEDETTI, N BOTTO, M G ANDREASSI, C TRAINO, E VANO, and E PICANO
Cumulative patient effective dose in cardiology
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2008; 81(969): 699 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. de Feyter and C. J. Schultz
Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for Screening Asymptomatic Subjects: A Bridge Too Far?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 29, 2008; 52(5): 366 - 368.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh
Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol ImgHome page
L. M. Boxt
CT angiography in children: it is accurate, but is it safe?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., May 1, 2008; 1(3): 340 - 342.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
K. L. Gould, T. Pan, C. Loghin, N. P. Johnson, and S. Sdringola
Reducing Radiation Dose in Rest-Stress Cardiac PET/CT by Single Poststress Cine CT for Attenuation Correction: Quantitative Validation
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 738 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, F. Bengel, C. Burgstahler, F. Cademartiri, P. de Feyter, R. George, P. Kaufmann, A. F. Kopp, J. Knuuti, et al.
Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: Report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology
Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2008; 29(4): 531 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
L. Husmann, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, O. Adda, V. Treyer, C. A. Wyss, P. Veit-Haibach, F. Tatsugami, G. K. von Schulthess, and P. A. Kaufmann
Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating
Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2008; 29(2): 191 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. L. Main, J. H. Goldman, and P. A. Grayburn
Thinking Outside the "Box" The Ultrasound Contrast Controversy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2007; 50(25): 2434 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]