Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;115:3181-3188
Published online before print June 11, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.667592
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/25/3181    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.667592v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Maresta, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marzocchi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Maresta, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID
*TAXOL
Medline Plus Health Information
*Angioplasty
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 2007;115:3181-3188.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents

Two-Year Results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell’Emilia Romagna) Multicenter Registry

Antonio Marzocchi, MD; Francesco Saia, MD, PhD; Giancarlo Piovaccari, MD; Antonio Manari, MD; Enrico Aurier, MD; Alberto Benassi, MD; Alberto Cremonesi, MD; Gianfranco Percoco, MD; Elisabetta Varani, MD; Paolo Magnavacchi, MD; Paolo Guastaroba, MSc; Roberto Grilli, MD; Aleardo Maresta, MD

From Istituto di Cardiologia (A. Marzocchi, F.S.), Università di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy; Unità Operativa di Cardiologia (G. Piovaccari), Ospedale degli Infermi, Rimini, Italy; Unità Operativa di Cardiologia Interventistica (A. Manari), Ospedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Divisione di Cardiologia (E.A.), Ospedale Maggiore, Parma, Italy; Laboratorio di Emodinamica (A.B.), Hesperia Hospital, Modena, Italy; Casa di cura Villa Maria Cecilia Hospital (A.C.), Cotignola (Ra), Italy; Laboratorio di Emodinamica (G. Percoco), Ospedale di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; Unità Operativa di Cardiologia–Centro Interventistico (E.V., A. Maresta), Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy; Nuovo Ospedale S. Agostino (P.M.), Modena, Italy; and Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale Regione Emilia-Romagna Bologna (P.G., R.G.), Bologna, Italy.

Correspondence to Francesco Saia, MD, PhD, Catheterization Laboratory, Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi (Pad 21), Via Massarenti, 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. E-mail francescosaia{at}hotmail.com

Received September 29, 2006; accepted April 13, 2007.

Background— The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been questioned recently.

Methods and Results— Between July 2002 and June 2005, 10 629 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with either DES (n=3064) or bare-metal stents (BMS, n=7565) were enrolled in a prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and angiographic stent thrombosis during 2-year follow-up. A propensity score analysis to adjust for different baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics was performed. The 2-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 17.8% in the DES group and 21.0% in the BMS group (P=0.003 by log-rank test). Angiographic stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the DES group and 0.6% in the BMS group (P=0.09). After adjustment, the 2-year cumulative incidence of death was 6.8% in the DES group and 7.4% in the BMS group (P=0.35), whereas the rates were 5.3% in DES and 5.8% in BMS for acute myocardial infarction (P=0.46), 9.1% in DES and 12.9% in BMS for target-vessel revascularization (P<0.00001), and 16.9% in DES and 21.8% in BMS for major adverse cardiac events (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of target-vessel revascularization in the DES group were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.76), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.69), and reference vessel diameter (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93).

Conclusions— In this large real-world population, the beneficial effect of DES in reducing the need for new revascularization compared with BMS extends to 2 years without evidence of a worse safety profile.


 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
A. Menozzi, E. Solinas, P. Ortolani, A. Repetto, F. Saia, G. Piovaccari, A. Manari, E. Magagnini, L. Vignali, E. Bonizzoni, et al.
Twenty-four months clinical outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of small coronary arteries: the long-term SES-SMART clinical study
Eur. Heart J., September 1, 2009; 30(17): 2095 - 2101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
R. Chacko, M. Mulhearn, V. Novack, L. Novack, L. Mauri, S. A. Cohen, J. Moses, M. B. Leon, and D. E. Cutlip
Impact of Target Lesion and Nontarget Lesion Cardiac Events on 5-Year Clinical Outcomes After Sirolimus-Eluting or Bare-Metal Stenting
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2009; 2(6): 498 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. K. James, U. Stenestrand, J. Lindback, J. Carlsson, F. Schersten, T. Nilsson, L. Wallentin, B. Lagerqvist, and the SCAAR Study Group
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal Stents in Sweden
N. Engl. J. Med., May 7, 2009; 360(19): 1933 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. S. Douglas, J. M. Brennan, K. J. Anstrom, A. Sedrakyan, E. L. Eisenstein, G. Haque, D. Dai, D. F. Kong, B. Hammill, L. Curtis, et al.
Clinical Effectiveness of Coronary Stents in Elderly Persons: Results From 262,700 Medicare Patients in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 5, 2009; 53(18): 1629 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Carlsson, S. K. James, J. Lindback, F. Schersten, T. Nilsson, U. Stenestrand, B. Lagerqvist, and for the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and An
Outcome of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stenting Used According to On- and Off-Label Criteria
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 21, 2009; 53(16): 1389 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
M. H. Shishehbor, S. J. Filby, A. K. Chhatriwalla, R. D. Christofferson, A. Jain, S. R. Kapadia, A. M. Lincoff, D. L. Bhatt, and S. G. Ellis
Impact of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents on Mortality in Patients With Anemia
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2009; 2(4): 329 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
R. J. Applegate, M. T. Sacrinty, M. A. Kutcher, R. M. Santos, S. K. Gandhi, and W. C. Little
3-Year Comparison of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., March 1, 2009; 2(3): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Kaltoft, L. O. Jensen, M. Maeng, H. H. Tilsted, P. Thayssen, M. Bottcher, J. F. Lassen, L. R. Krusell, K. Rasmussen, K. N. Hansen, et al.
2-Year Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of Sirolimus-Eluting, Paclitaxel-Eluting, and Bare-Metal Coronary Stents Results From the WDHR (Western Denmark Heart Registry).
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 24, 2009; 53(8): 658 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Ryan, W. Linde-Zwirble, L. Engelhart, L. Cooper, and D. J. Cohen
Temporal Changes in Coronary Revascularization Procedures, Outcomes, and Costs in the Bare-Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Eras: Results From the US Medicare Program
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 952 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. C. Philpott MD, D. A. Southern MSc, F. M. Clement PhD, P. D. Galbraith BN MSc, M. Traboulsi MD, M. L. Knudtson MD, W. A. Ghali MD, and for the APPROACH Investigators
Long-term outcomes of patients receiving drug-eluting stents
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 20, 2009; 180(2): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
M. A. Turco, J. A. Ormiston, J. J. Popma, J. J. Hall, T. Mann, L. A. Cannon, M. W.I. Webster, G. J. Mishkel, C. D. O'Shaughnessy, T. F. McGarry, et al.
Reduced Risk of Restenosis in Small Vessels and Reduced Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Long Lesions With the New Thin-Strut TAXUS Liberte Stent: 1-Year Results From the TAXUS ATLAS Program
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., December 1, 2008; 1(6): 699 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
A. J. Kirtane and D. J. Cohen
When Is Better Not Good Enough?: Insights From the COURAGE Economic Study
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, September 1, 2008; 1(1): 4 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. J. Malenka, A. V. Kaplan, F. L. Lucas, S. M. Sharp, and J. S. Skinner
Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting in the Era of Bare-Metal vs the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents
JAMA, June 25, 2008; 299(24): 2868 - 2876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. V. Anderson
Drug-Eluting Stents: Life Insurance With a Better Death Benefit
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2025 - 2027.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. Mauri and S.-L. T. Normand
Studies of Drug-Eluting Stents: To Each His Own?
Circulation, April 22, 2008; 117(16): 2047 - 2050.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
C. L. Grines, J. A. Goldstein, and R. D. Safian
Should We Routinely Use Drug-Eluting Stents for Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Let's Wait and See
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., April 1, 2008; 1(2): 136 - 138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Brinker
The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Ortolani, M. Balducelli, P. Marzaroli, G. Piovaccari, A. Menozzi, V. Guiducci, P. Sangiorgio, F. Tarantino, G. Geraci, F. Castriota, et al.
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Stents for Diabetic Patients With De Novo Coronary Lesions: Results From a Real-World Multicenter Registry
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 923 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
F. Saia, A. Marzocchi, and A. Branzi
Review: The safety of drug-eluting stents
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2008; 2(1): 43 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. J. Buttner and F.-J. Neumann
Peeling-Off Labels: Mounting Evidence for Benefit of Drug-Eluting Stents With Off-Label Use
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2037 - 2038.
[Full Text] [PDF]