Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2007;115:2990-2994
Published online before print May 1, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707778
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/23/2990    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707778v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krucoff, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krucoff, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents

(Circulation. 2007;115:2990-2994.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Special Report

Drug-Eluting Stents "Deliver Heartburn"

How Do We Spell Relief Going Forward?

Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD; Ashley Boam, MSBE; Daniel G. Schultz, MD

From the Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.W.K.), and Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md (A.B., D.G.S.).

Correspondence to Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, Duke University Medical Center, Room A3006, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail kruco001@mc.duke.edu


Key Words: device approval process • stents • thrombosis


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

"Breakthrough" technologies may produce rare or unexpected performance issues in postmarket use, especially when rapid market penetration into large patient populations outpaces the development of clinical knowledge. Although high-profile meetings or news media coverage may help draw attention to such issues, ultimately it is careful scientific consideration of safety and effectiveness issues, with transparent public access, that will help physicians and patients make decisions about how and when these technologies are best used in the practice of medicine. To this end, a 2-day special advisory panel on drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis was convened in December 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as has recently been summarized by Laskey et al1 and by Farb and Boam.2

Since the first safety alerts in 2003 to 2004 raised concerns that DES might be associated with an increase in rare but often catastrophic thrombotic events, public, professional, and regulatory attention has been focused on delineating the basis for this concern.3 In the spring of 2006, new reports of increased stent thrombosis rates with DES at the European Society of Cardiology in Barcelona led to a cascade of published reports and opinions4–7 that were characterized in The Wall Street Journal headline as "Coated Stents Deliver Heartburn."8 The article did not specify whether the reference was to heartburn in already-stented patients, cardiologists, DES manufacturers, the FDA, or Wall Street itself. In fact, the issues surrounding DES touch on all of the above.

The FDA panel’s proceedings served a key purpose by publicly reviewing . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. J. Malenka, A. V. Kaplan, F. L. Lucas, S. M. Sharp, and J. S. Skinner
Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting in the Era of Bare-Metal vs the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents
JAMA, June 25, 2008; 299(24): 2868 - 2876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. W. Krucoff, D. J. Kereiakes, J. L. Petersen, R. Mehran, V. Hasselblad, A. J. Lansky, P. J. Fitzgerald, J. Garg, M. A. Turco, C. A. Simonton III, et al.
A novel bioresorbable polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of single and multivessel coronary disease: primary results of the COSTAR (Cobalt Chromium Stent With Antiproliferative for Restenosis) II study.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 22, 2008; 51(16): 1543 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
N Melikian and W Wijns
Drug-eluting stents: a critique
Heart, February 1, 2008; 94(2): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. J. Kereiakes
The Emperor's New Clothes: Another Cypher Versus Taxus Post-Hoc Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1381 - 1385.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
N. Marx
Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular disease: a cardiologist's perspective
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 80 - 81.
[PDF]