| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2007;115:2990-2994.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.
Special Report |
From the Duke University Medical Center/Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (M.W.K.), and Center for Devices and Radiologic Health, United States Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md (A.B., D.G.S.).
Correspondence to Mitchell W. Krucoff, MD, Duke University Medical Center, Room A3006, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705. E-mail kruco001@mc.duke.edu
Key Words: device approval process stents thrombosis
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
"Breakthrough" technologies may produce rare or unexpected performance issues in postmarket use, especially when rapid market penetration into large patient populations outpaces the development of clinical knowledge. Although high-profile meetings or news media coverage may help draw attention to such issues, ultimately it is careful scientific consideration of safety and effectiveness issues, with transparent public access, that will help physicians and patients make decisions about how and when these technologies are best used in the practice of medicine. To this end, a 2-day special advisory panel on drug-eluting stent (DES) thrombosis was convened in December 2006 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as has recently been summarized by Laskey et al1 and by Farb and Boam.2
Since the first safety alerts in 2003 to 2004 raised concerns that DES might be associated with an increase in rare but often catastrophic thrombotic events, public, professional, and regulatory attention has been focused on delineating the basis for this concern.3 In the spring of 2006, new reports of increased stent thrombosis rates with DES at the European Society of Cardiology in Barcelona led to a cascade of published reports and opinions4–7 that were characterized in The Wall Street Journal headline as "Coated Stents Deliver Heartburn."8 The article did not specify whether the reference was to heartburn in already-stented patients, cardiologists, DES manufacturers, the FDA, or Wall Street itself. In fact, the issues surrounding DES touch on all of the above.
The FDA panels proceedings served a key purpose by publicly reviewing
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. J. Malenka, A. V. Kaplan, F. L. Lucas, S. M. Sharp, and J. S. Skinner Outcomes Following Coronary Stenting in the Era of Bare-Metal vs the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents JAMA, June 25, 2008; 299(24): 2868 - 2876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Krucoff, D. J. Kereiakes, J. L. Petersen, R. Mehran, V. Hasselblad, A. J. Lansky, P. J. Fitzgerald, J. Garg, M. A. Turco, C. A. Simonton III, et al. A novel bioresorbable polymer paclitaxel-eluting stent for the treatment of single and multivessel coronary disease: primary results of the COSTAR (Cobalt Chromium Stent With Antiproliferative for Restenosis) II study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 22, 2008; 51(16): 1543 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Melikian and W Wijns Drug-eluting stents: a critique Heart, February 1, 2008; 94(2): 145 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Kereiakes The Emperor's New Clothes: Another Cypher Versus Taxus Post-Hoc Meta-Analysis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 2, 2007; 50(14): 1381 - 1385. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Marx Rosiglitazone and cardiovascular disease: a cardiologist's perspective Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, June 1, 2007; 4(2): 80 - 81. [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |