Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:2480-2484
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.624882
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2006;113:2480-2484.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Left Main Coronary Revascularization at the Crossroads

Dean J. Kereiakes, MD; David P. Faxon, MD

From The Heart Center of Greater Cincinnati and The Lindner Center at The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio (D.J.K.), and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Mass (D.P.F.).

Correspondence to Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, The Heart Center of Greater Cincinnati and The Lindner Center at The Christ Hospital, 2123 Auburn Ave, Ste 424, Cincinnati, OH 45219. E-mail lindner@fuse.net


Key Words: Editorials • coronary disease • stents


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Percutaneous revascularization of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease has remained controversial for more than 25 years, since LMCA balloon angioplasty was first performed by Andreas Gruentzig in 1978. Summarizing his experience, Gruentzig concluded, "We have not been too successful with dilating left main stems...although the procedure is relatively simple, the potential complications are both sudden and serious."1 Following the evolution of percutaneous catheter-based therapies to include both bare metal stent and, more recently, drug-eluting stent (DES) platforms in conjunction with advances in periprocedural and postprocedural adjunctive pharmacotherapies, interest in percutaneous LMCA revascularization, particularly unprotected left main, has been renewed. Although studies performed with bare metal stents demonstrated a low rate of in-hospital mortality, the incidence of late coronary restenosis remained high.2–6 In the Unprotected Left Main Trunk Intervention Multi-Center Assessment (ULTIMA) registry, which enrolled 279 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who had percutaneous coronary revascularization (69% bare metal stent), mortality at a 1-year follow-up was proportional to clinical risk stratification (40% in high-risk versus 3.5% in low-risk patient cohorts), and repeated revascularization was required in 34% of cases.6 The experience gleaned from these studies continued to support the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline recommendations that in reasonable surgical candidates with LMCA disease, coronary bypass surgery is the preferred therapeutic option.7 After the introduction of DES, several small clinical series demonstrated the feasibility and short-term safety of LMCA stenting, while late clinical/angiographic outcomes appeared favorable as compared with historical (nonrandomized) patient cohorts treated with bare metal stents.3,8–11 . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. G. Kushner, M. Hand, S. C. Smith Jr, S. B. King III, J. L. Anderson, E. M. Antman, S. R. Bailey, E. R. Bates, J. C. Blankenship, D. E. Casey Jr, et al.
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 2009; 54(23): 2205 - 2241.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. G. Kushner, M. Hand, S. C. Smith Jr, S. B. King III, J. L. Anderson, E. M. Antman, S. R. Bailey, E. R. Bates, J. C. Blankenship, D. E. Casey Jr, et al.
2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines
Circulation, December 1, 2009; 120(22): 2271 - 2306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. N. Thomas, E. C. Martinez, F. Woitek, M. Y. Emmert, H. Sakaguchi, S. Muecke, C. N. Lee, and T. Kofidis
Off-pump coronary bypass grafting is safe and efficient in patients with left main disease and higher EuroScore
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 36(4): 616 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. R. Smith
Surgery, Not Percutaneous Revascularization, Is the Preferred Strategy for Patients With Significant Left Main Coronary Stenosis
Circulation, February 24, 2009; 119(7): 1013 - 1020.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
C. Wu, E. L. Hannan, G. Walford, and D. P. Faxon
Utilization and Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1153 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Brinker
The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. E. Buszman, S. R. Kiesz, A. Bochenek, E. Peszek-Przybyla, I. Szkrobka, M. Debinski, B. Bialkowska, D. Dudek, A. Gruszka, A. Zurakowski, et al.
Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2008; 51(5): 538 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Brocco, P. Spolaore, and G. Tarantini
Letter by Brocco et al Regarding Article, "Percutaneous Treatment With Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Bypass Surgery for Unprotected Left Main Stenosis: A Single-Center Experience"
Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): e573 - e573.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Kimmelstiel
Multislice Computed Tomography After Left Main Drug-Eluting Stenting: Are We Putting the CarT Before the Horse?
Circulation, August 15, 2006; 114(7): 616 - 619.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Drug-Eluting Stents vs. CABG for Left-Main Disease
Journal Watch Cardiology, July 19, 2006; 2006(719): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]