(Circulation. 2006;113:2269-2271.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From Medical City Dallas Hospital, and Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute (CRSTI), Dallas, Tex.
Correspondence to Michael J. Mack, MD, 7777 Forest Ln, Suite A-323, Dallas, TX 75230. E-mail mjmack@earthlink.net
Key Words: Editorials mitral valve regurgitation valves
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
The mitral valve is a complex structure composed of the leaflets, annulus, chordae tendineae, and papillary muscles. Competency of the mitral valve is dependent on the proper function of each of these component structures. The pathophysiological triad of mitral regurgitation (MR) was originally described by Carpentier in 1983.1 It included the etiology of the valve lesion, the valve lesion itself, and the resultant valve dysfunction. He subsequently described a classification of leaflet dysfunction in MR that is commonly used and relevant for patient selection and evaluation of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR). In type I dysfunction, there is normal leaflet motion, and valvular incompetence is due to either annular dilatation or leaflet perforation. Type II mitral dysfunction includes patients with increased leaflet motion (prolapse) of one or both leaflets so that there is failure of coaptation during systole resulting in mitral regurgitation. Patients in this category are those with degenerative myxomatous disease of the valve with chordal and/or papillary muscle elongation or rupture. Patients with type IIIa dysfunction have restriction of leaflet motion during both systole and diastole caused by leaflet and subvalvular apparatus thickening and fusion (rheumatic heart disease). The cause of valvular incompetence in patients with type IIIb dysfunction is restricted leaflet motion during systole caused by apical displacement of the papillary muscle from ventricular enlargement in dilated cardiomyopathy (functional MR) and lateral displacement of a posterior papillary muscle in ischemic MR. Patients may have a combination of causes of dysfunction (annular dilation, apical papillary muscle displacement), especially
Related Article:
Circulation 2006 113: 2329-2334.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Grayburn Should we operate on asymptomatic patients with severe mitral regurgitation? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., March 1, 2008; 1(2): 142 - 144. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Lansac, I. Di Centa, N. Al Attar, D. Messika-Zeitoun, R. Raffoul, A. Vahanian, and P. Nataf Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty through the coronary sinus: an anatomic point of view. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2008; 135(2): 376 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Mack Coronary Sinus in the Management of Functional Mitral Regurgitation: The Mother Lode or Fool's Gold? Circulation, August 1, 2006; 114(5): 363 - 364. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |