This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chung, A. K. Articles by Drazner, M. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chung, A. K. Articles by Drazner, M. H. Related Collections Contractile function Epidemiology Other heart failure CT and MRI Related Article

(Circulation. 2006;113:1597-1604.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Imaging

Women Have Higher Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions Than Men Independent of Differences in Left Ventricular Volume

The Dallas Heart Study

Anne K. Chung, BS; Sandeep R. Das, MD, MPH; David Leonard, PhD; Ronald M. Peshock, MD; Farhana Kazi, MD; Shuaib M. Abdullah, MD; Russell M. Canham, MD; Benjamin D. Levine, MD; Mark H. Drazner, MD, MSc

From the Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

Reprints requests to Dr Mark Drazner, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-9047. E-mail Mark.Drazner{at}utsouthwestern.edu

Received July 11, 2005; revision received January 18, 2006; accepted January 20, 2006.

Background— Although gender-specific criteria are common for defining cardiac traits such as left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) thresholds widely used in clinical practice have traditionally been the same for women and men, perhaps because it remains uncertain whether there is a systematic difference in LVEF between genders.

Methods and Results— Using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in a probability-based sample of Dallas County residents aged 30 to 65 years (1435 women and 1183 men), we compared LVEF in women and men. The association of gender with stroke volume independent of end-diastolic volume (EDV) or other potential confounders was assessed by multivariable analysis. Gender-specific thresholds for a low LVEF were defined at the 2.5th percentile in women and men from a healthy reference subpopulation. The median (25th, 75th percentile) LVEF was higher in women than in men (75% [70%, 79%] in women versus 70% [65%, 75%] in men, P<0.001). Left ventricular EDV and end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area were smaller in women than in men (P<0.001 for both). Gender remained significantly associated with stroke volume, independent of EDV and other potential confounders in multivariable analysis. A low LVEF was defined as below 61% in women and below 55% in men.

Conclusions— Women have a higher LVEF than men in the general population, secondary to a higher stroke volume for a given EDV independent of known potential confounders.

---

 

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE

Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2006 113: 1549. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. G. Rasmussen, S. H. Poulsen, E. Dupont, K. Ostergaard, G. Safikhany, and H. Egeblad Ergotamine-derived dopamine agonists and left ventricular function in Parkinson patients: systolic and diastolic function studied by conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging, and two-dimensional speckle tracking Eur J Echocardiogr, May 7, 2008; (2008) jen160v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Mehta, J. E. Rame, A. Khera, S. A. Murphy, R. M. Canham, R. M. Peshock, J. A. de Lemos, and M. H. Drazner Left Ventricular Hypertrophy, Subclinical Atherosclerosis, and Inflammation Hypertension, June 1, 2007; 49(6): 1385 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Y. Chang, S. M. Abdullah, T. Jain, H. G. Stanek, S. R. Das, D. K. McGuire, R. J. Auchus, and J. A. de Lemos Associations Among Androgens, Estrogens, and Natriuretic Peptides in Young Women: Observations From the Dallas Heart Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; (2006) j.jacc.2006.10.040v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]