Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:I-281-I-285
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.524702
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glineur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hanet, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glineur, D.
Right arrow Articles by Hanet, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2005;112:I-281 – I-285.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease

Resistance to Flow of Arterial Y-Grafts 6 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

David Glineur, MD; Philippe Noirhomme, MD; Jim Reisch, MS; Gebrine El Khoury, MD; Parla Astarci, MD; Claude Hanet, MD, PhD

From the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, University of Louvain Medical School, Brussels, Belgium.

Correspondence to Dr Claude Hanet, University of Louvain Medical School, Division of Cardiology, Ave Hippocrate 10/2881, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail hanet{at}card.ucl.ac.be

Background— The use of both internal thoracic arteries (ITAs) as a Y-graft configuration has been proposed as a technique allowing complete arterial revascularization. Controversy remains, however, about the capacity of this Y-graft configuration to provide sufficient blood flow to the whole left coronary system and about possible steal phenomenon occurring during periods of maximal myocardial blood flow demand.

Methods and Results— To evaluate graft conductance 6 months after Y-graft revascularization of the left coronary system with both ITAs, 11 consecutive patients were studied during cardiac catheterization. In all of the cases, the left ITA had been connected to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) territory (mean, 1.3 anastomoses), and the free right ITA was anastomosed proximally to the left ITA and distally to the left circumflex (LCX) territory (mean, 1.9 anastomoses). Pressure and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were recorded using a 0.014-inch pressure wire advanced distally in the left ITA main stem close to the proximal anastomosis of the free right ITA (ITA-stem) and in the distal part of each ITA branch at the site of their implantation to the LAD (ITA-LAD) or LCX (ITA-LCX) system. At each of these sites, the pressure gradient between aorta and the graft was measured in basal condition and during maximal hyperemia induced by intragraft bolus injection of 40 µg of adenosine. In basal conditions, the pressure gradient was minimal between the aorta and the ITA-stem (2±2 mm Hg), the ITA-LAD (3±3 mm Hg), and the ITA-LCX (3±2 mm Hg; P value was not significant versus ITA-LAD). During maximal hyperemia, the pressure gradient increased to 7±2 mm Hg in the ITA-stem, to 9±5 mm Hg in the ITA-LAD, and to 9±3 in the ITA-LCX (P value not significant versus ITA-LAD). The fractional flow reserve was 0.93±0.03 in the ITA-stem, 0.91±0.04 in the ITA-LAD, and 0.91±0.03 in the ITA-LCX.

Conclusions— A Y-graft configuration with a free right ITA attached to a pedicled left ITA allows an adequate revascularization of the whole left coronary system with an even distribution of perfusion pressure in both distal branches and minimal resistance to maximal blood flow.


Key Words: surgery • adenosine • bypass • coronary disease • internal thoracic artery