Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:I-208-I-211
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512889
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudino, M.
Right arrow Articles by Possati, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Hazardous Substances DB
*ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE
Related Collections
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:I-208 – I-211.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Myocardial Protection and Vascular Biology

Implantation in Coronary Circulation Induces Morphofunctional Transformation of Radial Grafts From Muscular to Elastomuscular

Mario Gaudino, MD; Francesco Prati, MD; Eugenio Caradonna, MD; Carlo Trani, MD; Francesco Burzotta, MD; Giovanni Schiavoni, MD; Franco Glieca, MD; Gianfederico Possati, MD

From the Departments of Cardiac Surgery (M.G., F.G., G.P.) and Cardiology (C.T., F.B., G.S.), Catholic University, and San Giovanni Hospital (F.P., E.C.), Rome, Italy

Correspondence to Dr Mario Gaudino, Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy. E-mail: mgaudino{at}tiscali

Background— The purpose of this research was to investigate the in vivo morphofunctional changes induced in the radial artery (RA) by its use as coronary artery bypass conduit by comparing the morphological features and vasoreactivity of the native RA versus the coronary RA graft in the same patient.

Methods and Results— Ten years after surgery, 10 patients were submitted to intravascular ultrasound examination of the RA graft of the controlateral (in situ) RA and of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft and to vasoactive challenges with acetylcholine and serotonin. Quantitative angiographic assessment showed that the mean diameter of the RA coronary grafts was significantly larger than that of the in situ RA and of the ITA (2.89±0.40 mm RA grafts, 2.14±0.52 mm in situ RA, 2.25±0.53 mm ITA grafts; P<0.001). The in situ RA demonstrated a typical muscular architecture, whereas RA coronary grafts showed a clear reduction of the thickness of the medial layer and had a less well-defined muscular component of the media with interposition of elastic tissue. Serotonin endovascular infusion elicited a strong spastic reaction in in situ RAs; the same challenge induced only moderate constriction in RA and ITA coronary grafts.

Conclusions— Implantation in the coronary circulation leads to major anatomic and vasoreactive modifications of the RAs that tend to lose the morphofunctional features of a muscular conduit and assume those of an elastomuscular artery, such as the ITA.


Key Words: coronary disease • radial artery • surgery