Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:1214-1222
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.478263
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verma, A.
Right arrow Articles by Prystowsky, E. N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 2005;112:1214-1230.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine

Should atrial fibrillation ablation be considered first-line therapy for some patients?

Why Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Should Be Considered First-Line Therapy for Some Patients

Atul Verma, MD; Andrea Natale, MD

From the Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (A.V., A.N.), and The Care Group, LLC, Indianapolis, Ind (B.J.P., E.N.P.).

Correspondence to Andrea Natale, MD, Co-Section Head of Pacing and Electrophysiology, Co-Chairman Center for Atrial Fibrillation, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Desk F 15, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. (e-mail natalea@ccf.org); or Eric N. Prystowsky, MD, FACC, The Care Group, LLC, 8333 Naab Rd, No. 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260 (e-mail eprystow@thecaregroup.com).


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common disease that affects patient morbidity and mortality. To date, treatments of AF have been frustrating, serving at best to palliate this arrhythmia. AF ablation, on the other hand, has emerged as a promising new treatment strategy. In contrast to rate control or antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation offers the possibility of a lasting cure. When ablation was first described, it was prudently reserved as a "last-line" treatment for highly symptomatic patients who were refractory to all other options. However, over the past 5 years, many centers worldwide have been reporting high success rates and few complications with ablation. There is also an increasing consistency in the way in which the procedure is performed, although some of the tools may still differ. AF ablation has reached "prime time," and it appears appropriate that we expand its indications.

We believe that it is now appropriate to offer AF ablation as first-line therapy for selected patients in experienced centers. Here, we stress the importance of maintaining sinus rhythm, the poor efficacy of nonablative treatments, and the emergence of an effective and safe approach to AF ablation.


*    The Importance of Sinus Rhythm
 
Recently, the importance of maintaining sinus rhythm has been called into question. A few large clinical trials have been published comparing treatment strategies for AF. In particular, the AF Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM),1 Rate Control Versus Electrical Cardioversion for AF (RACE),2 and Strategies for Treatment of AF (STAF)3 trials compared a strategy of rate control and a rhythm control approach . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
T. J. Klinkenberg, S. Ahmed, A. T. Hagen, A. C.P. Wiesfeld, E. S. Tan, F. Zijlstra, and I. C. Van Gelder
Feasibility and outcome of epicardial pulmonary vein isolation for lone atrial fibrillation using minimal invasive surgery and high intensity focused ultrasound
Europace, December 1, 2009; 11(12): 1624 - 1631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. Aliot and J. N. Ruskin
Controversies in ablation of atrial fibrillation
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., September 1, 2008; 10(suppl_H): H32 - H54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. Noheria, A. Kumar, J. V. Wylie Jr, and M. E. Josephson
Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review
Arch Intern Med, March 24, 2008; 168(6): 581 - 586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. A. Stephenson and C. I. Berul
Electrophysiological Interventions for Inherited Arrhythmia Syndromes
Circulation, August 28, 2007; 116(9): 1062 - 1080.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Scanavacca, C. F. Pisani, D. Hachul, S. Lara, C. Hardy, F. Darrieux, I. Trombetta, C. E. Negrao, and E. Sosa
Selective Atrial Vagal Denervation Guided by Evoked Vagal Reflex to Treat Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Circulation, August 29, 2006; 114(9): 876 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]