Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;112:624-626
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.553321
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ades, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ades, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, M. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Exercise for Children
*Exercise for Seniors
*Exercise and Physical Fitness
*Seniors' Health
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation

(Circulation. 2005;112:624-626.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Accelerated Decline of Aerobic Fitness With Healthy Aging

What Is the Good News?

Philip A. Ades, MD; Michael J. Toth, PhD

From the University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington.

Correspondence to Philip A. Ades, MD, McClure 1, Cardiology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Fletcher-Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT 05401. E-mail Philip.Ades@vtmednet.org


Key Words: Editorials • exercise • aging • physiology


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
As we get older, even if we are healthy, we become less fit. At the extreme, we become disabled and eventually die. Although this deterioration in physical work capacity is widely accepted, few studies have characterized changes in aerobic capacity across the age span. Instead, the majority of studies have utilized cross-sectional designs. These studies are limited, however, by selective survival—ie, older participants, as a group, are inherently healthier than younger individuals, as evidenced by their survival. Thus, the 5% to 10% drop in aerobic fitness per decade, defined from cross-sectional studies, may well be an underestimate.1–6

See p 674


*    The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging
 
The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging began recruiting healthy individuals into a long-term descriptive study in 1978.7 Subjects were screened at baseline for clinical heart disease. Screening included a symptom-limited exercise test supplemented by nuclear perfusion imaging in men >40 and women >50 years of age. The participants were predominantly white and college educated and lived in the Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area. Every 2 years they spent 2 full days at the Gerontology Research Center in Baltimore, Md, where they underwent medical, physiological, and psychological testing. Individuals without onset of clinical heart disease underwent maximal treadmill exercise testing on alternate visits. It should be noted that although elimination of individuals who developed clinical heart disease allowed the researchers to examine the effects of aging per se on exercise capacity without the confounding effects of disease, this approach almost certainly removed less-fit individuals from the analysis because poor fitness is a well-known . . . [Full Text of this Article]