| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;112:387-395.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Imaging |
From Chair of Cardiology (G.D.S., M.G.R., P.C., G.P., R.C.) and Noninvasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology (P.C., R.L.P., A.F., A.R.M., A.D., S.S., N.M.), Second University of Naples, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Correspondence to Giovanni Di Salvo, MD, PhD, FESC, Via Omodeo 45, Naples 80128, Italy. E-mail giodisal{at}yahoo.it
Received April 2, 2004; revision received February 25, 2005; accepted March 4, 2005.
Background Accurate echocardiographic parameters to predict maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are poorly defined. This study was conducted to assess the atrial myocardial properties during AF through myocardial velocity, strain rate, and strain and to compare their prognostic value in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with lone AF with standard transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
Methods and Results Sixty-five consecutive patients with lone AF for
3 months underwent TTE, TEE, and myocardial velocity and strain and strain rate imaging examinations before successful external cardioversion. Maintenance of sinus rhythm was assessed during a 9-month follow-up. Atrial myocardial velocity, strain, and strain rate values in AF patients were compared with those of age- and sex-matched referents. Moreover, clinical and echocardiographic parameters of patients with maintenance of sinus rhythm (MSR patients) over the 9-month follow-up period (n=25) were compared with those from patients with AF recurrence (AFR patients; n=40). Atrial myocardial properties assessed by myocardial velocity, strain rate, and strain were significantly reduced (P<0.0001) in patients (velocity, 3.2±1.4 cm/s; strain, 23.3±19%; strain rate, 2±0.9 seconds1) compared with referents (velocity, 5.7±1.3 cm/s; strain, 92±26%; strain rate, 4.2±1.8 seconds1). The individual predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance were atrial appendage flow velocity (MSR patients, 39±12 cm/s; AFR patients, 32±15 cm/s; P<0.01) assessed by TEE and atrial strain (MSR patients, 33±27%; AFR patients, 17±9%; P=0.0007) and strain rate (MSR patients, 2.7±1 seconds1; AFR patients, 1.6±0.6 seconds1; P<0.0001) peak systolic values. Atrial strain (P<0.0001; coefficient, 0.015; SE, 0.003) and strain rate (P<0.0001; coefficient, 0.372; SE, 0.075) parameters alone were confirmed as independent predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance by multivariable analysis.
Conclusions Patients with higher atrial strain and strain rate appear to have a greater likelihood of staying in sinus rhythm. If the current data are verified in future studies, then additional pharmacological therapy and maintenance of anticoagulants for a longer period may need to be considered in those with lower atrial strain and strain rate measurements.
Key Words: atrium echocardiography fibrillation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. B. Kaya, L. Tokgozoglu, K. Aytemir, U. Kocabas, E. Tulumen, O. S. Deveci, S. Kose, G. Kabakci, N. Nazli, H. Ozkutlu, et al. Atrial myocardial deformation properties are temporarily reduced after cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and correlate well with left atrial appendage function Eur J Echocardiogr, July 1, 2008; 9(4): 472 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dokainish and S. J. Connolly Atrial deformation: the key to maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation? Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2008; 29(12): 1483 - 1484. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schneider, R. Malisius, K. Krause, F. Lampe, E. Bahlmann, S. Boczor, M. Antz, S. Ernst, and K.-H. Kuck Strain rate imaging for functional quantification of the left atrium: atrial deformation predicts the maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2008; 29(11): 1397 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Abraham, V. L. Dimaano, and H.-Y. Liang Role of Tissue Doppler and Strain Echocardiography in Current Clinical Practice Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2597 - 2609. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D'Andrea, P. Caso, S. Romano, R. Scarafile, L. Riegler, G. Salerno, G. Limongelli, G. Di Salvo, P. Calabro, L. Del Viscovo, et al. Different effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left atrial function in patients with either idiopathic or ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a two-dimensional speckle strain study Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2007; 28(22): 2738 - 2748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F Tops, E. E van der Wall, M. J Schalij, and J. J Bax Multi-modality imaging to assess left atrial size, anatomy and function Heart, November 1, 2007; 93(11): 1461 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Hoit Assessing Atrial Mechanical Remodeling and Its Consequences Circulation, July 19, 2005; 112(3): 304 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |