This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hanekom, L. Articles by Marwick, T. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanekom, L. Articles by Marwick, T. H. Related Collections Contractile function Chronic ischemic heart disease Echocardiography CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2005;112:3892-3900.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Imaging

Incremental Value of Strain Rate Analysis as an Adjunct to Wall-Motion Scoring for Assessment of Myocardial Viability by Dobutamine Echocardiography

A Follow-Up Study After Revascularization

Lizelle Hanekom, MD; Carly Jenkins, BS; Leanne Jeffries, BS; Colin Case, MD; Julie Mundy, MD; Carmel Hawley, MD; Thomas H. Marwick, MD, PhD

From the University of Queensland Department of Medicine (L.H., C.J., L.J., C.C., C.H., T.H.M.) and the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (J.M.), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Reprint requests to Prof T. Marwick, University of Queensland Department of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. E-mail tmarwick{at}soms.uq.edu.au

Received July 2, 2004; revision received July 12, 2005; accepted September 2, 2005.

Background— Assessment of myocardial viability based on wall-motion scoring (WMS) during dobutamine echocardiography (DbE) is difficult and subjective. Strain-rate imaging (SRI) is quantitative, but its incremental value over WMS for prediction of functional recovery after revascularization is unclear.

Methods and Results— DbE and SRI were performed in 55 stable patients (mean age, 64±10 years; mean ejection fraction, 36±8%) with previous myocardial infarction. Viability was predicted by WMS if function augmented during low-dose DbE. SR, end-systolic strain (ESS), postsystolic strain (PSS), and timing parameters were analyzed at rest and with low-dose DbE in abnormal segments. Regional and global functional recovery was defined by side-by-side comparison of echocardiographic images before and 9 months after revascularization. Of 369 segments with abnormal resting function, 146 showed regional recovery. Compared with segments showing functional recovery, those that failed to recover had lower low-dose DbE SR, SR increment (SR), ESS, and ESS increment (ESS) (each P<0.005). After optimal cutoffs for the strain parameters were defined, the sensitivity of low-dose DbE SR (78%, P=0.3), SR (80%, P=0.1), ESS (75%, P=0.6), and ESS (74%, P=0.8) was better though not significantly different from WMS (73%). The specificity of WMS (77%) was similar to the SRI parameters. Combination of WMS and SRI parameters augmented the sensitivity for prediction of functional recovery above WMS alone (82% versus 73%, P=0.015; area under the curve=0.88 versus 0.73, P<0.001), although specificities were comparable (80% versus 77%, P=0.2).

Conclusions— The measurement of low-dose DbE SR and SR is feasible, and their combination with WMS assessment improves the sensitivity of viability assessment with DbE.

Key Words: heart failure • echocardiography • imaging • myocardial infarction • stress

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N R Van de Veire, J De Sutter, J J Bax, and J R T C Roelandt Technological advances in tissue Doppler imaging echocardiography Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 1065 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. H. Rahimtoola, V. Dilsizian, C. M. Kramer, T. H. Marwick, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde Chronic Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction: From Pathophysiology to Imaging and its Integration Into Clinical Practice J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., July 1, 2008; 1(4): 536 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Abraham and A. C. Pinheiro Speckle-Derived Strain: A Better Tool for Quantification of Stress Echocardiography? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 15, 2008; 51(2): 158 - 160. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, and H. Michelena Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 315 - 348. [Full Text]

				P. G. Camici, S. K. Prasad, and O. E. Rimoldi Stunning, Hibernation, and Assessment of Myocardial Viability Circulation, January 1, 2008; 117(1): 103 - 114. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. P. Abraham, V. L. Dimaano, and H.-Y. Liang Role of Tissue Doppler and Strain Echocardiography in Current Clinical Practice Circulation, November 27, 2007; 116(22): 2597 - 2609. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Ingul, E. Rozis, S. A. Slordahl, and T. H. Marwick Incremental Value of Strain Rate Imaging to Wall Motion Analysis for Prediction of Outcome in Patients Undergoing Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1252 - 1259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Thomas and Z. B. Popovic Assessment of Left Ventricular Function by Cardiac Ultrasound J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2012 - 2025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. H. Marwick Measurement of Strain and Strain Rate by Echocardiography: Ready for Prime Time? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 4, 2006; 47(7): 1313 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gorcsan III Echocardiographic Strain Imaging for Myocardial Viability: An Improvement Over Visual Assessment? Circulation, December 20, 2005; 112(25): 3820 - 3822. [Full Text] [PDF]