| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;112:2426-2435.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Heart Failure |
From Lund University, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden (R.W.); Thoraxcenter, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands (D.J.v.V.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre, St James Hospital, Dublin, Ireland (B.S.); Medizinische Klinik III, University of Cologne, Germany (E.E.); Medicine A, University Hospital Zürich, Switzerland (F.F.); Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine and Medicine, Monash University, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (H.K.); Cardiology Department, Clinical Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland (P.P.); The Nottingham Clinical Research Limited, Nottingham, UK (A.S.); Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (L.v.d.V., P.V.); and Service de Pharmacologie, Hopital Pitié-Salpetriere, Paris, France (P.L.).
Correspondence to Dr Ronnie Willenheimer, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, S-205 02 Malmö, Sweden. E-mail ronnie.willenheimer{at}med.lu.se
Received August 10, 2005; revision received August 29, 2005; accepted August 29, 2005.
Background In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), a ß-blocker is generally added to a regimen containing an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. It is unknown whether ß-blockade as initial therapy may be as useful.
Methods and Results We randomized 1010 patients with mild to moderate CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction
35%, who were not receiving ACE inhibitor, ß-blocker, or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy, to open-label monotherapy with either bisoprolol (target dose 10 mg QD; n=505) or enalapril (target dose 10 mg BID; n=505) for 6 months, followed by their combination for 6 to 24 months. The 2 strategies were blindly compared with regard to the combined primary end point of all-cause mortality or hospitalization and with regard to each of these end point components individually. Bisoprolol-first treatment was noninferior to enalapril-first treatment if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the absolute between-group difference was <5%, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.17. In the intention-to-treat sample, the primary end point occurred in 178 patients allocated to bisoprolol-first treatment versus 186 allocated to enalapril-first treatment (absolute difference 1.6%, 95% CI 7.6 to 4.4%, HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.16). In the per-protocol sample, 163 patients allocated to bisoprolol-first treatment had a primary end point, versus 165 allocated to enalapril-first treatment (absolute difference 0.7%, 95% CI 6.6 to 5.1%, HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.21). With bisoprolol-first treatment, 65 patients died, versus 73 with enalapril-first treatment (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.22), and 151 versus 157 patients were hospitalized (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.76 to 1.19).
Conclusion Although noninferiority of bisoprolol-first versus enalapril-first treatment was not proven in the per-protocol analysis, our results indicate that it may be as safe and efficacious to initiate treatment for CHF with bisoprolol as with enalapril.
Key Words: heart failure drugs adrenergic beta-antagonists angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 112: 2377.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. W. Stevenson Challenges for the Basis of Practice in Heart Failure Circ Heart Fail, May 1, 2008; 1(1): 81 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duckelmann, F. Mittermayer, D. G. Haider, J. Altenberger, J. Eichinger, and M. Wolzt Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Enhances Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 2037 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rapaport Update in cardiology. Ann Intern Med, October 17, 2006; 145(8): 618 - 625. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Coca, H. M. Krumholz, A. X. Garg, and C. R. Parikh Underrepresentation of renal disease in randomized controlled trials of cardiovascular disease. JAMA, September 20, 2006; 296(11): 1377 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Willenheimer How to begin treatment in chronic heart failure? Results of CIBIS III Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2006; 8(suppl_C): C43 - C50. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lehman Evidently... Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 41 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., April 1, 2006; 11(2): 63 - 64. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.H. W. Tang and G. S. Francis The Year in Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2125 - 2133. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Which First for Heart Failure: ACE Inhibitor or Beta-Blocker? Journal Watch Cardiology, October 28, 2005; 2005(1028): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Fang Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or {beta}-Blockers in Heart Failure: Does It Matter Who Goes First? Circulation, October 18, 2005; 112(16): 2380 - 2382. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |