| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2005;111:2617-2622.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology |
From University Hospital Bern (S.W., P.W., M.T., D.T., R.Z., C.S., B.M., O.M.H.), University Hospital Zurich (F.R.E., M.R.), and Cardiocentro Lugano (G.P., T.M.), Switzerland; and University Hospital Munich (Innenstadt) (V.K.), University Hospital Kiel (R.S., M.L.), and German Heart Center and Technical University (J.M., A.K.), Munich, Germany.
Correspondence to Stephan Windecker, MD, Director, Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail stephan.windecker{at}insel.ch
Received June 22, 2004; revision received November 3, 2004; accepted February 15, 2005.
Background Stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia in the porcine restenosis model. We designed a prospective, randomized, clinical study to investigate the safety and efficacy of titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents compared with stainless steel stents.
Methods and Results Ninety-two patients with de novo lesions were randomly assigned to treatment with titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents (n=45) or stainless steel stents of otherwise identical design (n=47; control). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. At 30 days, no stent thromboses or other adverse events had occurred in either group. Quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months revealed lower late loss (0.55±0.63 versus 0.90±0.76 mm, P=0.03) and percent diameter stenosis (26±17% versus 36±24%, P=0.04) in lesions treated with titanium-nitride oxidecoated than in control stents. Binary restenosis was reduced from 33% in the control group to 15% in the titanium-nitride oxidecoated stent group (P=0.07). Intravascular ultrasound studies at 6 months showed smaller neointimal volume in titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents than in control stents (18±21 versus 48±28 mm3, P<0.0001). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months were less frequent in titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents than in control stenttreated patients (7% versus 27%, P=0.02), largely driven by a reduced need for target-lesion revascularization (7% versus 23%, P=0.07).
Conclusions Revascularization with titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents is safe and effective in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Titanium-nitride-oxidecoated stents reduce restenosis and major adverse cardiac events compared with stainless steel stents of otherwise identical design.
Key Words: stents restenosis revascularization
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. E. Stahli, G. G. Camici, and F. C. Tanner Drug-eluting stent thrombosis Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2009; 3(1): 45 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Windecker and B. Meier Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1952 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Luscher, J. Steffel, F. R. Eberli, M. Joner, G. Nakazawa, F. C. Tanner, and R. Virmani Drug-Eluting Stent and Coronary Thrombosis: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fajadet, W. Wijns, G.-J. Laarman, K.-H. Kuck, J. Ormiston, T. Munzel, J. J. Popma, P. J. Fitzgerald, R. Bonan, R. E. Kuntz, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery Lesions: Clinical and Angiographic Results of the ENDEAVOR II Trial Circulation, August 22, 2006; 114(8): 798 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill The Year in Interventional Cardiology J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1689 - 1706. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Serruys, M. J.B. Kutryk, and A. T.L. Ong Coronary-Artery Stents N. Engl. J. Med., February 2, 2006; 354(5): 483 - 495. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |