Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:2617-2622
Published online before print May 9, 2005, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.486647
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
111/20/2617    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.104.486647v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Windecker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hess, O. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*TITANIUM
*TITANIUM DIOXIDE
Related Collections
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Coronary circulation

(Circulation. 2005;111:2617-2622.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.


Interventional Cardiology

Randomized Comparison of a Titanium-Nitride-Oxide–Coated Stent With a Stainless Steel Stent for Coronary Revascularization

The TiNOX Trial

Stephan Windecker, MD; Rüdiger Simon, MD; Markus Lins, MD; Volker Klauss, MD; Franz R. Eberli, MD; Marco Roffi, MD; Giovanni Pedrazzini, MD; Tiziano Moccetti, MD; Peter Wenaweser, MD; Mario Togni, MD; David Tüller, MD; Rainer Zbinden, MD; Christian Seiler, MD; Julinda Mehilli, MD; Adnan Kastrati, MD; Bernhard Meier, MD; Otto M. Hess, MD

From University Hospital Bern (S.W., P.W., M.T., D.T., R.Z., C.S., B.M., O.M.H.), University Hospital Zurich (F.R.E., M.R.), and Cardiocentro Lugano (G.P., T.M.), Switzerland; and University Hospital Munich (Innenstadt) (V.K.), University Hospital Kiel (R.S., M.L.), and German Heart Center and Technical University (J.M., A.K.), Munich, Germany.

Correspondence to Stephan Windecker, MD, Director, Invasive Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail stephan.windecker{at}insel.ch

Received June 22, 2004; revision received November 3, 2004; accepted February 15, 2005.

Background— Stent coating with titanium-nitride-oxide has been shown to reduce neointimal hyperplasia in the porcine restenosis model. We designed a prospective, randomized, clinical study to investigate the safety and efficacy of titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents compared with stainless steel stents.

Methods and Results— Ninety-two patients with de novo lesions were randomly assigned to treatment with titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents (n=45) or stainless steel stents of otherwise identical design (n=47; control). Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. At 30 days, no stent thromboses or other adverse events had occurred in either group. Quantitative coronary angiography at 6 months revealed lower late loss (0.55±0.63 versus 0.90±0.76 mm, P=0.03) and percent diameter stenosis (26±17% versus 36±24%, P=0.04) in lesions treated with titanium-nitride oxide–coated than in control stents. Binary restenosis was reduced from 33% in the control group to 15% in the titanium-nitride oxide–coated stent group (P=0.07). Intravascular ultrasound studies at 6 months showed smaller neointimal volume in titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents than in control stents (18±21 versus 48±28 mm3, P<0.0001). Major adverse cardiac events at 6 months were less frequent in titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents than in control stent–treated patients (7% versus 27%, P=0.02), largely driven by a reduced need for target-lesion revascularization (7% versus 23%, P=0.07).

Conclusions— Revascularization with titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents is safe and effective in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. Titanium-nitride-oxide–coated stents reduce restenosis and major adverse cardiac events compared with stainless steel stents of otherwise identical design.


Key Words: stents • restenosis • revascularization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Windecker and B. Meier
Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis
Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1952 - 1965.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. F. Luscher, J. Steffel, F. R. Eberli, M. Joner, G. Nakazawa, F. C. Tanner, and R. Virmani
Drug-Eluting Stent and Coronary Thrombosis: Biological Mechanisms and Clinical Implications
Circulation, February 27, 2007; 115(8): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Fajadet, W. Wijns, G.-J. Laarman, K.-H. Kuck, J. Ormiston, T. Munzel, J. J. Popma, P. J. Fitzgerald, R. Bonan, R. E. Kuntz, et al.
Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery Lesions: Clinical and Angiographic Results of the ENDEAVOR II Trial
Circulation, August 22, 2006; 114(8): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The Year in Interventional Cardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1689 - 1706.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. W. Serruys, M. J.B. Kutryk, and A. T.L. Ong
Coronary-Artery Stents
N. Engl. J. Med., February 2, 2006; 354(5): 483 - 495.
[Full Text] [PDF]