(Circulation. 2005;111:2154-2156.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Department of Cardiology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Ga.
Correspondence to Dr Peter C. Block, Emory University Hospital, 1364 Clifton Rd, F606, Atlanta, GA 30322. E-mail Peter_block@emoryhealthcare.org
Key Words: Editorials mitral regurgitation surgery trials echocardiography
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Treatment strategies for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) are changing. Current guidelines suggest that patients with symptoms, atrial arrhythmias (especially atrial fibrillation), pulmonary hypertension, or left ventricular (LV) decompensation heralded by changes in LV ejection fraction should undergo mitral valve surgery.1 In addition, for patients in whom valvular repair is likely, the guidelines also suggest that an asymptomatic patient with severe MR and normal LV function might undergo mitral valve repair to prevent the sequelae of chronic MR. Earlier and earlier treatment and mitral valve repair are now the surgical norm. In one sense, the guard is already changing.2
See p 2183
Repair of the mitral valve is associated with an at least equivalent late survival rate compared with replacement, and perhaps lower operative risk.3,4 A reduced risk of endocarditis, fewer thromboembolic complications, and better preservation of LV function5,6 make repair an attractive strategy; however, successful mitral valve surgery is dependent on individual valve pathology. In rheumatic mitral regurgitation, the distorted leaflet anatomy, associated subvalvular fibrosis, and calcification rarely allow valve repair. Patients with ischemic or congestive heart disease, LV remodeling, annular dilation, alteration of the subvalvular apparatus, and distorted leaflet coaptation present special challenges. Most surgeons attempt a complete repair, combining direct valvular restoration with an annuloplasty device. If the guard is to change successfully as we move toward percutaneous transcatheter repair, then valuable lessons learned during many years of surgical experience must not be forgotten. The challenges are magnified severalfold in percutaneous approaches.
The wind of change is
Related Article:
Circulation 2005 111: 2183-2189.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Plass, I. Valenta, O. Gaemperli, P. Kaufmann, H. Alkadhi, G. Zund, J. Grunenfelder, and M. Genoni Assessment of coronary sinus anatomy between normal and insufficient mitral valves by multi-slice computertomography for mitral annuloplasty device implantation Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 33(4): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Choure, M. J. Garcia, B. Hesse, M. Sevensma, G. Maly, N. L. Greenberg, L. Borzi, S. Ellis, E. M. Tuzcu, and S. R. Kapadia In Vivo Analysis of the Anatomical Relationship of Coronary Sinus to Mitral Annulus and Left Circumflex Coronary Artery Using Cardiac Multidetector Computed Tomography: Implications for Percutaneous Coronary Sinus Mitral Annuloplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 1938 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Webb, J. Harnek, B. I. Munt, P. O. Kimblad, M. Chandavimol, C. R. Thompson, J. R. Mayo, and J. O. Solem Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Annuloplasty: Initial Human Experience With Device Implantation in the Coronary Sinus Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Percutaneous Annuloplasty Reduces MR in Sheep Journal Watch Cardiology, July 8, 2005; 2005(708): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |