Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:259-264
Published online before print June 28, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000135589.85501.DB
Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
110/3/259    most recent
01.CIR.0000135589.85501.DBv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, D. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Restenosis
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 2004;110:259-264.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Articles

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in the Elderly

An Analysis of Medicare Claims Data

Mary Ann Clark, MHA; Ameet Bakhai, MD, MRCP; Michael J. Lacey, MS; Elise M. Pelletier, MS; David J. Cohen, MD, MSc

From the Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boston Scientific Corporation, Natick, Mass (M.A.C., M.L., E.M.P.); Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (A.B., D.J.C.); Clinical Trials and Evaluation Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK (A.B.); and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (D.J.C.).

Correspondence to David J. Cohen, MD, MSc, Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail dcohen{at}caregroup.harvard.edu

Received March 31, 2003; de novo received February 2, 2004; revision received March 25, 2004; accepted March 29, 2004.

Background— Outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have been documented extensively in clinical trials and single-center series, but few data exist on the clinical and economic outcomes after PCI in an unselected population.

Methods and Results— We used the Medicare Standard Analytic File to identify all initial PCI procedures performed in 1998 among a random sample of 5% of all Medicare beneficiaries ≥65 years of age. These patients (n=9868) were followed up for 1 year after PCI to identify clinical outcomes, medical resource use, and costs. Between 1 month and 1 year after PCI, 16.9% of patients required ≥1 repeat revascularization procedures. Mean 1-year medical care costs increased 5-fold among patients with repeat revascularization compared with those without ($26 186 versus $5344; P<0.001). After adjustment for baseline differences, the independent cost of repeat revascularization was $19 074 (95% CI, 18 440 to 19 707). Assuming from previous studies that 85% of repeat revascularization procedures over the first year of follow-up are attributable to restenosis, the estimated clinical restenosis rate was 14.4%, and the 1-year economic burden of restenosis to the healthcare system was $2747 per initial PCI procedure.

Conclusions— Among unselected elderly patients undergoing PCI, repeat revascularization occurs in {approx}14% and increases 1-year healthcare costs by >$19 000 per occurrence. These findings have important implications for the cost-effectiveness of new treatments that substantially reduce restenosis.


Key Words: angioplasty • cost-benefit analysis • epidemiology • restenosis • stents




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. V. Anderson
Drug-Eluting Stents: Life Insurance With a Better Death Benefit
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2025 - 2027.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. H. Corbett
ETHICAL ISSUES, JUSTIFICATION, REFERRAL CRITERIA FOR BUDGET LIMITED AND HIGH-DOSE PROCEDURES
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 1, 2008; (2008) ncn089v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
K. Kuwabara, S. Matsuda, Y. Imanaka, K. Fushimi, H. Hashimoto, and K. Ishikawa
The effect of age and procedure on resource use for patients with cerebrovascular disease
J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 26 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Ryan and D. J. Cohen
Are Drug-Eluting Stents Cost-Effective?: It Depends on Whom You Ask
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1736 - 1744.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Bakhai, G. W. Stone, E. Mahoney, T. A. Lavelle, C. Shi, R. H. Berezin, B. J. Lahue, M. A. Clark, M. J. Lacey, M. E. Russell, et al.
Cost Effectiveness of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: Results From the TAXUS-IV Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 253 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]