Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;110:e572-e576
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148986.52696.07
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, W. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Health Screening
Related Collections
Right arrow AHA Statements and Guidelines
Right arrow Other diagnostic testing

(Circulation. 2004;110:e572-e576.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


AHA Conference Proceedings

CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease

Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Laboratory Tests Available to Assess Inflammation—Performance and Standardization: A Background Paper

William L. Roberts, MD, PhD

Abstract

Inflammation plays a key role in atherosclerosis. A number of different biomarkers of inflammation are measurable in blood. These include cytokines, chemokines, soluble adhesion molecules, and acute-phase reactants. The first 3 groups of molecules are not routinely measured in clinical laboratories. The acute-phase reactants include C-reactive protein (CRP). This analyte is stable and is readily measured by several commercial high-sensitivity (hs) assays, and numerous clinical studies have demonstrated its usefulness as an atherosclerotic risk marker. For these reasons, CRP is currently the inflammatory marker of choice. Comparison of commercial hsCRP assays has demonstrated that many are capable of imprecision of <7% at a CRP concentration of <1 mg/L. Method comparability studies have shown good agreement among some commercial hsCRP assays in terms of quartile assignments, whereas additional standardization efforts are necessary for others. The first goal of standardization is to develop a secondary reference material with a CRP of {approx}4 mg/L. This material can be used to assist diagnostic vendors in calibrator value assignment and assay harmonization. Another project is to define clearly what performance characteristics are necessary for hsCRP assays. Preliminary estimates based on the biological variability of CRP indicate that the total allowable analytical error is between 15% and 32%. The former requirement can be met with accuracy and imprecision of <5% and the latter requirement with accuracy and imprecision of <11%. If 2 hsCRP results are averaged, then the imprecision requirements are relaxed slightly. Clinical validation of these performance requirements is also required.


Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements • atherosclerosis • inflammation • risk factors




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
D Gimeno, J E Ferrie, M Elovainio, L Pulkki-Raback, L Keltikangas-Jarvinen, C Eklund, M Hurme, T Lehtimaki, J Marniemi, J S A Viikari, et al.
When do social inequalities in C-reactive protein start? A life course perspective from conception to adulthood in the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 290 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. Wei, A. T. Whaley-Connell, K. Chen, J. Habibi, G. M.-E. Uptergrove, S. E. Clark, C. S. Stump, C. M. Ferrario, and J. R. Sowers
NADPH Oxidase Contributes to Vascular Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, and Remodeling in the Transgenic (mRen2) Rat
Hypertension, August 1, 2007; 50(2): 384 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
V. Jeevanantham, N. Singh, K. Izuora, J. P. D'souza, and D. H. Hsi
Correlation of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Calcific Aortic Valve Disease
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2007; 82(2): 171 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. Juonala, J. S.A. Viikari, T. Ronnemaa, L. Taittonen, J. Marniemi, and O. T. Raitakari
Childhood C-Reactive Protein in Predicting CRP and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, August 1, 2006; 26(8): 1883 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Mora, N. Rifai, J. E. Buring, and P. M Ridker
Additive Value of Immunoassay-Measured Fibrinogen and High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Levels for Predicting Incident Cardiovascular Events
Circulation, August 1, 2006; 114(5): 381 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. S. Vasan
Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Molecular Basis and Practical Considerations
Circulation, May 16, 2006; 113(19): 2335 - 2362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. A. Pearson, G. A. Mensah, Y. Hong, and S. C. Smith Jr
CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Overview
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e543 - e544.
[Full Text] [PDF]