This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Desai, N. D. Articles by Goldman, B. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Desai, N. D. Articles by Goldman, B. S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Related Collections Health policy and outcome research CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2004;110:II-7 – II-12.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.

Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease

Why Is Off-Pump Coronary Surgery Uncommon in Canada? Results of a Population-Based Survey of Canadian Heart Surgeons

Nimesh D. Desai, MD; Marc P. Pelletier, MD MSc; Hari R. Mallidi, MD; George T. Christakis, MD MSc; Gideon N. Cohen, MD PhD; Stephen E. Fremes, MD MSc; Bernard S. Goldman, MD

From Sunnybrook and Women’s College, Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr. Bernard S. Goldman, Sunnybrook and Women’s Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Room H410, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5. E-mail bernard.goldman{at}sw.ca

Background— Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and decrease resource use. However, off-pump surgery is not widely used in Canada. The purpose of this study was to determine the current use of OPCAB in Canada and determine why surgeons have not adopted this technique.

Methods and Results— The study was a population-based survey of all adult Canadian cardiac surgeons in practice >1 year. Eligible division heads and surgeons were contacted by mail. Of 19 806 isolated coronary bypass surgeries performed by respondents in Canada last year, 3164 (16.0%) were performed off-pump. More than 50% of Canadian surgeons performed OPCAB in <5% of coronary cases, and only 17% of surgeons performed OPCAB in >25% of coronary cases. Only 4 responding centers performed OPCAB in >25% of cases. Respondents were divided into those who performed <5% of cases off-pump (nonadopters), 5% to 25% off-pump (intermediate users), or >25% off-pump (enthusiasts). Mean number of distal anastomoses in off-pump cases were 1.7±0.6, 1.6±0.6, and 3.3±0.5 for nonadopters, intermediate users, and enthusiasts, respectively (P=0.001). Eleven percent of nonadopters, 55% of intermediate users, and 81% of enthusiasts believed OPCAB improved clinical outcomes (P<0.0001). Only 23% of all respondents felt OPCAB use would increase in the next 5 years.

Conclusions— Concerns regarding incomplete revascularization and lack of proven clinical benefit have limited OPCAB to being performed routinely by only a small number of surgeons in Canada.

Key Words: cardiopulmonary bypass • surgery • coronary disease • off-pump • health professional survey