Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:3182-3190
Published online before print June 7, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000130849.08704.24
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
109/25/3182    most recent
01.CIR.0000130849.08704.24v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kindermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Böhm, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kindermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Böhm, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CARVEDILOL
*METOPROLOL
Related Collections
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology

(Circulation. 2004;109:3182-3190.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Carvedilol but Not Metoprolol Reduces ß-Adrenergic Responsiveness After Complete Elimination From Plasma In Vivo

Michael Kindermann, MD*; Christoph Maack, MD*; Susanne Schaller; Nadine Finkler; Kathrin I. Schmidt; Stephanie Läer, MD; Henrike Wuttke, MD; Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD; Michael Böhm, MD

From Klinik für Innere Medizin III (M.K., C.M., S.S., N.F., K.I.S., M.B.) and Klinik für Thorax-und Herz-Gefäßchirurgie (H.-J.S.), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, and Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg (S.L., H.W.), Germany. Dr Maack currently is at Johns Hopkins University, Department of Cardiology, Baltimore, Md.

Correspondence to Michael Kindermann, MD, Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, D 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. E-mail Michael.Kindermann{at}t-online.de

Received December 2, 2003; revision received March 4, 2004; accepted March 15, 2004.

Background— Carvedilol but not metoprolol exhibits persistent binding to ß-adrenergic receptors (ß-ARs) even after washout in cell culture experiments. Here, we determined the significance of this phenomenon on human ß-ARs in vitro and in vivo.

Methods and Results— Experiments were conducted on human atrial trabeculae (n=8 to 10 per group). In the presence of metoprolol, isoproterenol potency was reduced compared with controls (P<0.001). In the presence of carvedilol, isoproterenol identified 2 distinct binding sites of high (36±6%; –8.8±0.4 log mol/L) and low affinity (–6.5±0.2 log mol/L). After ß-blocker washout, isoproterenol potency returned to control values in metoprolol-treated muscles, whereas in carvedilol-treated preparations, isoproterenol potency remained decreased (P<0.001 versus control). In vivo studies were performed in 9 individuals receiving metoprolol succinate (190 mg/d) or carvedilol (50 mg/d) for 11 days in a randomized crossover design. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (5 to 40 µg · kg–1 · min–1) was performed before, during, and 44 hours after application of study medication. ß-Blocker medication reduced heart rate, heart rate–corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, and cardiac output compared with baseline (P<0.02 to 0.0001). After withdrawal of metoprolol, all parameters returned to baseline values, whereas after carvedilol, all parameters remained reduced (P<0.05 to 0.001) despite complete plasma elimination of carvedilol.

Conclusions— Carvedilol but not metoprolol inhibits the catecholamine response of the human heart beyond its plasma elimination. The persistent ß-blockade by carvedilol may be explained by binding of carvedilol to an allosteric site of ß-ARs.


Key Words: beta-antagonists • heart failure • receptors, adrenergic, beta




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J CARDIOVASC PHARMACOL THERHome page
T. J. Vittorio, R. Zolty, M. E. Kasper, R. M. Khandwalla, D. S. Hirsh, C.-H. Tseng, U. P. Jorde, and K. Ahuja
Differential Effects of Carvedilol and Metoprolol Succinate on Plasma Norepinephrine Release and Peak Exercise Heart Rate in Subjects With Chronic Heart Failure
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2008; 13(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
P. Lechat
The evolution of heart failure management over recent decades: from CONSENSUS to CIBIS
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2006; 8(suppl_C): C5 - C12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
P. Molenaar, T. Christ, U. Ravens, and A. Kaumann
Carvedilol blocks {beta}2- more than {beta}1-adrenoceptors in human heart
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2006; 69(1): 128 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Klotz, A. Barbone, S. Reiken, J. W. Holmes, Y. Naka, M. C. Oz, A. R. Marks, and D. Burkhoff
Left ventricular assist device support normalizes left and right ventricular beta-adrenergic pathway properties
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 1, 2005; 45(5): 668 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]