Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:2386-2393
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000128597.37025.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melo, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dzau, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melo, L. G.
Right arrow Articles by Dzau, V. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Physiological and pathological control of gene expression
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrow Oxidant stress

(Circulation. 2004;109:2386-2393.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Review: Current Perspective

Molecular and Cell-Based Therapies for Protection, Rescue, and Repair of Ischemic Myocardium

Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Luis G. Melo, PhD; Alok S. Pachori, PhD; Deling Kong, PhD; Massimiliano Gnecchi, MD; Kai Wang, MD; Richard E. Pratt, PhD; Victor J. Dzau, MD

From the Department of Physiology (L.G.M., K.W.), Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and Department of Medicine (L.G.M., A.S.P., D.K., M.G., R.E.P., V.J.D.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Luis G. Melo, PhD, Department of Physiology, Queen’s University, 20 Stuart St, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada. E-mail melol@post.queensu.ca


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Despite the significant therapeutic advances of the past 25 years, coronary ischemic artery disease (CAD) remains the predominant cause of premature death.1,2 The prevalence of the disease imposes enormous financial strain on the healthcare system,2,3 calling for new approaches for treatment of CAD. The availability of cardiotropic vectors capable of long-term and stable protein expression4 and the recent isolation of progenitor cells with regenerative and angiogenic potential5,6 may provide opportunities for the design of novel therapies for protection and rescue of the myocardium from ischemia and failure. Cardioprotective gene therapy strategies have been effective in animal models of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury,7,8 and gene transfer of proangiogenic cytokines has been used as a strategy for rescuing ischemic myocardium.9 Transplantation of autologous progenitor cells is emerging as a potential option for the revascularization and repair of ischemic and infarcted myocardium.6 Notwithstanding these promising findings, there is pressing need for the development of safer and more effective vectors and the optimization and standardization of gene- and cell-based therapies.

In this article, we discuss the current preclinical and clinical advances in gene- and cell-based therapies for protection, rescue, and repair of the ischemic myocardium, with emphasis on strategies for protection of the myocardium from ischemia and reperfusion injury and for neovascularization and regeneration of ischemic and infarcted myocardium.


*    Gene Therapy for Protection of Myocardium at Risk
 
The development of gene therapies for acute myocardial infarction (MI) is not possible with the current vectors because the time required for transcription and translation of therapeutic genes exceeds the time window for successful . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. A. Kuliszewski, H. Fujii, C. Liao, A. H. Smith, A. Xie, J. R. Lindner, and H. Leong-Poi
Molecular imaging of endothelial progenitor cell engraftment using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and targeted microbubbles
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2009; 83(4): 653 - 662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Gnecchi, Z. Zhang, A. Ni, and V. J. Dzau
Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy
Circ. Res., November 21, 2008; 103(11): 1204 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
R. Senior
To revascularize or not to revascularize: a dilemma in heart failure.
Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 15, 2006; 175(4): 372 - 372.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. Gnecchi, H. He, N. Noiseux, O. D. Liang, L. Zhang, F. Morello, H. Mu, L. G. Melo, R. E. Pratt, J. S. Ingwall, et al.
Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement
FASEB J, April 1, 2006; 20(6): 661 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
V. J. Dzau, M. Gnecchi, and A. S. Pachori
Enhancing Stem Cell Therapy Through Genetic Modification
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 4, 2005; 46(7): 1351 - 1353.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. L. Springer, R. E. Sievers, M. N. Viswanathan, M. S. Yee, E. Foster, W. Grossman, and Y. Yeghiazarians
Closed-chest cell injections into mouse myocardium guided by high-resolution echocardiography
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1307 - H1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Chareonthaitawee, B. J. Gersh, P. A. Araoz, and R. J. Gibbons
Revascularization in Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: The Role of Viability Testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 16, 2005; 46(4): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]