Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2004;109:1460-1462
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000124795.36864.78
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Willerson, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kereiakes, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Willerson, J. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Choosing a Doctor or Health Care Service
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Other Ethics and Policy

(Circulation. 2004;109:1460-1462.)
© 2004 American Heart Association, Inc.


Mini-Review: Expert Opinions

US Health Care

Entitlement or Privilege?

Dean J. Kereiakes, MD; James T. Willerson, MD

From The Lindner Center for Research and Education/Ohio Heart Health Center (D.J.K.), Cincinnati, Ohio, and St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital/Texas Heart Institute (J.T.W.), Houston, Tex.

Correspondence to Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, The Lindner Center for Research & Education, 2123 Auburn Ave, Suite 424, Cincinnati, OH 45219 (e-mail lindner@fuse.net); or James T. Willerson, MD, St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital/Texas Heart Institute, 6720 Bertner Ave, Room B524 (MCI-267), Houston, TX 77030-2697 (e-mail suzy.lanier@uth.tmc.edu).


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

— —The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies, July 4, 1776

These words of our founding fathers succinctly congeal the aspirations of all Americans. Although the reference to freedom is unambiguous, the reference to "life" has both figurative and literal interpretations. Was the intent an entitlement to healthcare services? In a country based on free enterprise driven by market forces with an emphasis on consumer choice, was the intent of our forefathers to define health care as unalienable right? Support for this intent may have been provided by the US Congress in 1965 when "first-dollar coverage" was introduced with the inception of Medicare. And yet, in virtually all other sectors of American life (except health care), financial responsibility enables freedom of choice. In buying a house or car, choosing a hotel, or dining at a restaurant, consumers choose what they are willing to pay, and market forces determine the price. This free-market, consumer-driven process implicitly values the quality of goods and personal services provided. Hence, the common adage, "You get what you pay for."

Recent advances in medical technology have had a significant salutary effect on the morbidity and mortality rates associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, primary preventative measures and techniques for early (preclinical) detection have evolved. Public news media have sensationalized medical . . . [Full Text of this Article]