| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:292.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Kára, MD
ek, MD, PhD
, MD
í Toman, MD, PhD
umbera, MD, PhDFrom the Institute of Scientific Instruments (J.H., P.J.), Academy of Sciences; St Annes University Hospital (T.K., M.S., M.N., R.P., J.T., J.S.); and the Faculty of Medicine (Z.N.), Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Mayo Clinic (T.K., W.K.S., V.K.S.), Rochester, Minn; Chelsea & Westminster Hospital (D.P.F.), London; Colchester General Hospital (L.C.D.), Colchester; and the National Heart & Lung Institute (A.J.S.C.), London, UK.
Reprint requests to Josef Halámek, PhD, Institute of Scientific Instruments, AS CR, Královopolská 147, 612 64 Brno, Czech Republic. E-mail josef{at}isibrno.cz
Background We postulated that the variability of the phase shift between blood pressure and heart rate fluctuation near the frequency of 0.10 Hz might be useful in assessing autonomic circulatory control.
Methods and Results We tested this hypothesis in 4 groups of subjects: 28 young, healthy individuals; 13 elderly healthy individuals; 25 patients with coronary heart disease; and 19 patients with a planned or implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD recipients). Data from 5 minutes of free breathing and at 2 different, controlled breathing frequencies (0.10 and 0.33 Hz) were used. Clear differences (P<0.001) in variability of phase were evident between the ICD recipients and all other groups. Furthermore, at a breathing frequency of 0.10 Hz, differences in baroreflex sensitivity (P<0.01) also became evident, even though these differences were not apparent at the 0.33-Hz breathing frequency.
Conclusions The frequency of 0.10 Hz represents a useful and potentially important one for controlled breathing, at which differences in blood pressureRR interactions become evident. These interactions, whether computed as a variability of phase to define stability of the blood pressureheart rate interaction or defined as the baroreflex sensitivity to define the gain in heart rate response to blood pressure changes, are significantly different in patients at risk for sudden arrhythmic death. In young versus older healthy individuals, only baroreflex gain is different, with the variability of phase being similar in both groups. These measurements of short-term circulatory control might help in risk stratification for sudden cardiac death.
Key Words: baroreceptors respiration death, sudden
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Narkiewicz, P. van de Borne, N. Montano, D. Hering, T. Kara, and V. K. Somers Sympathetic Neural Outflow and Chemoreflex Sensitivity Are Related to Spontaneous Breathing Rate in Normal Men Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 51 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Baba, T. Yoshikawa, Y. Fukuda, T. Sugiyama, M. Shimada, M. Akaishi, K. Tsuchimoto, S. Ogawa, and M. Fu Autoantibodies against M2-muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: new upstream targets in atrial fibrillation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1108 - 1115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |