| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:2201.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Johannes Gutenberg University Medical School, Clinic of Anesthesiology, Mainz, Germany (B.B.W., D.K.M., M.F.S., H.T., W.F.D.); the Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens Institute, Innsbruck, Austria (K.H.L.); Advanced Circulatory Systems Inc, Eden Prairie, Minn (T.A.P., K.G.L.); and the Division of Biostatistics (D.A.), School of Public Health, and Department of Emergency Medicine (K.G.L.), University of Minnesota, and Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis.
Correspondence to Keith G. Lurie, MD, Box 508, UMHC, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail lurie002{at}tc.umn.edu
Received July 14, 2003; revision received August 8, 2003; accepted August 13, 2003.
Background Active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR combined with an inspiratory impedance threshold device (ITD) improves vital organ blood flow during cardiac arrest. This study compared survival rates with ACD+ITD CPR versus standard manual CPR (S-CPR).
Methods and Results A prospective, controlled trial was performed in Mainz, Germany, in which a 2-tiered emergency response included early defibrillation. Patients with out-of-hospital arrest of presumed cardiac pathogenesis were sequentially randomized to ACD+ITD CPR or S-CPR by the advanced life support team after intubation. Rescuers learned which method of CPR to use at the start of each work shift. The primary end point was 1-hour survival after a witnessed arrest. With ACD+ITD CPR (n=103), return of spontaneous circulation and 1- and 24-hour survival rates were 55%, 51%, and 37% versus 37%, 32%, and 22% with S-CPR (n=107) (P=0.016, 0.006, and 0.033, respectively). One- and 24-hour survival rates in witnessed arrests were 55% and 41% with ACD+ITD CPR versus 33% and 23% in control subjects (P=0.011 and 0.019), respectively. One- and 24-hour survival rates in patients with a witnessed arrest in ventricular fibrillation were 68% and 58% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 27% and 23% after S-CPR (P=0.002 and 0.009), respectively. Patients randomized
10 minutes after the call for help to the ACD+ITD CPR had a 3 times higher 1-hour survival rate than control subjects (P=0.002). Hospital discharge rates were 18% after ACD+ITD CPR versus 13% in control subjects (P=0.41). In witnessed arrests, overall neurological function trended higher with ACD+ITD CPR versus control subjects (P=0.07).
Conclusions Compared with S-CPR, ACD+ITD CPR significantly improved short-term survival rates for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Additional studies are needed to evaluate potential long-term benefits of ACD+ITD CPR.
Key Words: cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation treatment
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dichtwald, I. Matot, and S. Einav Improving the Outcome of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Importance of Being EARNEST Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2009; 13(1): 19 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Topjian, R. A. Berg, and V. M. Nadkarni Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Advances in Science, Techniques, and Outcomes Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): 1086 - 1098. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Anstadt and J. E. Lowe Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 487 - 506. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rickards, K. L. Ryan, W. H. Cooke, K. G. Lurie, and V. A. Convertino Inspiratory resistance delays the reporting of symptoms with central hypovolemia: association with cerebral blood flow Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): R243 - R250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Srinivasan, V. M. Nadkarni, D. Yannopoulos, B. S. Marino, G. Sigurdsson, S. H. McKnite, M. Zook, D. G. Benditt, and K. G. Lurie Rapid Induction of Cerebral Hypothermia Is Enhanced With Active Compression-Decompression Plus Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device Cardiopulmonary Resusitation in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 21, 2006; 47(4): 835 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 6: CPR Techniques and Devices Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-47 - IV-50. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Part 4: Advanced Life Support Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yannopoulos, V. M. Nadkarni, S. H. McKnite, A. Rao, K. Kruger, A. Metzger, D. G. Benditt, and K. G. Lurie Intrathoracic Pressure Regulator During Continuous-Chest-Compression Advanced Cardiac Resuscitation Improves Vital Organ Perfusion Pressures in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 803 - 811. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Ewy Cardiocerebral Resuscitation: The New Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2134 - 2142. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Active Compression-Decompression CPR with an Inspiratory Impedance Device Is Promising Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, December 17, 2003; 2003(1217): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. SoRelle Cardiovascular News Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108 (18): e9047 - e9048. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |