Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1292-1294
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000088844.63899.78
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sadanandan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weintraub, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sadanandan, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2003;108:1292.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Focused Perspective

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Patients After Acute Myocardial Infarction

William S. Weintraub, MD; Saihari Sadanandan, MD

From the Departments of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga (W.S.W.), and University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City (S.S.).

Correspondence to William S. Weintraub, MD, Emory University, 1256 Briarcliff Rd, Atlanta, GA 30306. E-mail wweintr@emory.edu


Key Words: Editorials • myocardial infarction • angioplasty • reperfusion


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Reperfusion after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the cornerstone of the initial therapy. Although reperfusion can be accomplished with either primary angioplasty or fibrinolytic therapy, clinical trial data reveal improved outcome with primary angioplasty. Furthermore, primary angioplasty with coronary stenting results in less repeat revascularization than balloon angioplasty. Despite the advantages of mechanical revascularization, primarily with stenting, the majority of patients presenting with AMI will receive pharmacological reperfusion.

See p 1324

How then should patients with AMI who are initially treated medically subsequently be managed? Medical therapy with platelet inhibition, ß-blockade, ACE inhibition, and lipid lowering can all be accomplished according to guidelines. However, what is the role of revascularization after the most acute period? In patients with recurrent ischemia or severe multivessel disease with left ventricular dysfunction, the role of revascularization is relatively clear. However, is there a place for routine percutaneous revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) in stable, post-AMI patients with 1-vessel disease?

To address this question, Zeymer et al1 randomized 300 patients with 1-vessel disease 1 to 6 weeks after AMI to angioplasty or medical therapy between 1994 and 1997. Fibrinolytic therapy was used in 180 patients (60%). All patients had significant stenosis or total occlusion (29%) of the infarct-related artery (IRA) and no or mild angina. All but 11 (7.4%) patients in the invasive arm underwent angioplasty, but only 17% received stents. One-year mortality was 0.7% with angioplasty versus 3.3% with medical therapy (P=0.21), and freedom from death, MI, revascularization, or readmission . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty and Medical Therapy in Stable Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Single Vessel Disease: A Study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte
Uwe Zeymer, Rainer Uebis, Albrecht Vogt, Hans-Georg Glunz, Hans-Friedrich Vöhringer, Dietrich Harmjanz, and Karl-Ludwig Neuhaus
Circulation 2003 108: 1324-1328. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ther Adv Cardiovasc DisHome page
G. Tacoy, G. E. Yazici, M. Erden, and T. Timurkaynak
The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2009; 3(3): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
G. E. Yazici, M. Erden, G. A. Tacoy, B. B. Yavuz, S. Turkoglu, and T. Timurkaynak
The Optimal Time of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Patients After ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Angiology, February 1, 2009; 60(1): 67 - 73.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. R. Anderson, N. Nagajothi, J.-L. E. Velazquez-Cecena, S. Khosla, B. Wong, O. Erdogan, L. De Luca, F. Tomai, D. Chua, A. Lo, et al.
Persistent Coronary Occlusion after Myocardial Infarction
N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2007; 356(16): 1681 - 1684.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. G. Steg, C. Thuaire, D. Himbert, D. Carrie, S. Champagne, D. Coisne, K. Khalife, P. Cazaux, D. Logeart, M. Slama, et al.
DECOPI (DEsobstruction COronaire en Post-Infarctus): a randomized multi-centre trial of occluded artery angioplasty after acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2004; 25(24): 2187 - 2194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]