Published online before print June 30, 2003, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000079140.35025.1E
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;108:60.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Surface Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Right and Left Atrial Flutter
From the Cardiovascular Research Institute and Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology (A.B., Y.Y., R.J.L., M.M.S.), University of California, San Francisco; Texas Heart Institute, St Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Tex (J.C.); the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (E.C.K.), San Francisco, Calif; and the Section of Cardiac Electrophysiology (N.F.M., A.N.), Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
*Drs Bochoeyer and Yang are co-first authors.
Correspondence to Melvin M. Scheinman, MD, Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of California, San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave, MU E 4S, Box 1354, San Francisco, CA 94143-1354. E-mail scheinman{at}medicine.ucsf.edu
Background— There is little information about the surface expression of non-cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent right atrial (RA) or left atrial (LA) flutter circuits.
Methods and Results— We retrospectively evaluated 32 episodes (in 26 patients) of atypical RA and 22 episodes (in 21 patients) of LA flutter. The surface ECG of 13 patients with lower-loop reentry was similar to that of their pattern during counterclockwise (CCW) CTI atrial flutter (AFL), except for decreased amplitude of the terminal forces in the inferior leads. In 11 of 24 episodes characterized by high or multiple breaks over the crista, the ECG showed changes that depended on the initial activation sequence of the LA. In 7 of 8 episodes of upper-loop reentry, the ECG pattern completely mimicked that for clockwise (CW) CTI AFL. All 11 patients with an LA septal circuit showed a typical ECG pattern characterized by prominent forces in lead V1 with flat deflections in the other surface leads. Eleven patients with other LA circuits had a more variable pattern but showed decreased voltage in the inferior leads compared with that of a group with CCW-CTI AFL (1.6±1 vs 2.68±0.7 mV, respectively; P<0.05).
Conclusions— The RA surface-ECG patterns different from those of CCW or CW-CTI could still be CTI dependent. In contrast, a typical CW-CTI surface pattern was always seen in patients with upper-loop reentry, which was non-CTI dependent. LA AFL circuits had either flat or low-amplitude forces in the inferior leads.
Key Words: electrophysiology • atrial flutter • mapping • catheter ablation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  G. Barbato, V. Carinci, C. Tomasi, V. Frassineti, M. Margheri, and G. Di Pasquale Is electrocardiography a reliable tool for identifying patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter? Europace, August 1, 2009; 11(8): 1071 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.#x.;n. Farré, H. J.J. Wellens, J.#x. M. Rubio, and J. Benezet CHAPTER 28 Supraventricular Tachycardias ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Medi and J. M. Kalman Prediction of the atrial flutter circuit location from the surface electrocardiogram Europace, July 1, 2008; 10(7): 786 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Maury, A. Duparc, A. Hebrard, M. El Bayomy, and M. Delay Prevalence of typical atrial flutter with reentry circuit posterior to the superior vena cava: Use of entrainment at the atrial roof Europace, February 1, 2008; 10(2): 190 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. P. Daubert Iatrogenic Left Atrial Tachycardias: Where Are We? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 30, 2007; 50(18): 1788 - 1790. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Brown, D. E. Krummen, G. K. Feld, and S. M. Narayan Using Electrocardiographic Activation Time and Diastolic Intervals to Separate Focal From Macro-Re-Entrant Atrial Tachycardias J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 15, 2007; 49(19): 1965 - 1973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Sanders, M. Hocini, P. Jais, L.-F. Hsu, Y. Takahashi, M. Rotter, C. Scavee, J.-L. Pasquie, F. Sacher, T. Rostock, et al. Characterization of Focal Atrial Tachycardia Using High-Density Mapping J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2088 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. L. Hoppe, A. M. Kahn, G. K. Feld, A. Hassankhani, and S. M. Narayan Separating Atrial Flutter From Atrial Fibrillation With Apparent Electrocardiographic Organization Using Dominant and Narrow F-Wave Spectra J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2079 - 2087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Yuniadi, C.-T. Tai, K.-T. Lee, B.-H. Huang, Y.-J. Lin, S. Higa, T.-Y. Liu, J.-L. Huang, P.-C. Lee, and S.-A. Chen A New Electrocardiographic Algorithm to Differentiate Upper Loop Re-Entry From Reverse Typical Atrial Flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 2, 2005; 46(3): 524 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. P. Gerstenfeld, D. J. Callans, S. Dixit, A. M. Russo, H. Nayak, D. Lin, W. Pulliam, S. Siddique, and F. E. Marchlinski Mechanisms of Organized Left Atrial Tachycardias Occurring After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1351 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J.J. Wellens and A. P. Gorgels The Electrocardiogram 102 Years After Einthoven Circulation, February 10, 2004; 109(5): 562 - 564. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|