Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:2284-2286
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000069360.38675.22
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Feyter, P.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Feyter, P.J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2003;107:2284.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Percutaneous Treatment of Saphenous Vein Bypass Graft Obstructions

A Continuing Obstinate Problem

P.J. de Feyter, MD

From Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Correspondence to Prof Dr P.J. de Feyter, Thoraxcenter, Room Bd 410, Erasmus Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail defeyter@card.azr.nl


Key Words: Editorials • veins • bypass • occlusion


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Percutaneous coronary intervention has made great strides since its inception and is nowadays the most frequently used modality for revascularization of coronary obstructions. Remaining problems are the treatment of chronic total occlusions, the occurrence of in-stent restenosis (although this may now be resolved, albeit not completely, by drug-eluting stents), and lastly the treatment of saphenous vein bypass graft (SVBG) obstructions.

See p 2331

Percutaneous treatment of SVBG obstructions is notoriously difficult because it often results in inadequate dilatation, a high likelihood of distal embolization associated with mortality and significant morbidity, and a high restenosis rate.1 The difficulties in the percutaneous treatment of SVBG lesions are largely related to the extent and severity of vein graft atherosclerotic disease, which progresses unrelentingly over time, such that 10 years after bypass operation almost 50% of the vein grafts are occluded.

Atherosclerosis of the vein graft is associated with large, soft, and friable plaques containing necrotic debris, cholesterol crystals, foam cells, and blood elements, and there is often overlying thrombotic material, particularly in older degenerated grafts. Occlusive obstructions are often extended over a long segment of the graft, while the remainder of the graft is diffusely diseased.2 Instrumentation of these friable lesions carries a high risk of distal embolization with subsequent myocardial necrosis. Distal embolization is of great concern because there appears to be no adequate treatment, and it must therefore be prevented.

Percutaneous Treatment of Nonocclusive SVBG Obstructions

Percutaneous treatment of SVBG lesions was attempted in the early days of balloon angioplasty. In selected patients with focal lesions, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Treatment of Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts With Ultrasound Thrombolysis: A Randomized Study (ATLAS)
Mandeep Singh, Uri Rosenschein, Kalon K.L. Ho, Peter B. Berger, Richard Kuntz, and David R. Holmes, Jr
Circulation 2003 107: 2331-2336. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Rodes-Cabau, O. F. Bertrand, E. Larose, J.-P. Dery, S. Rinfret, R. Bagur, G. Proulx, C. M. Nguyen, M. Cote, M.-C. Landcop, et al.
Comparison of Plaque Sealing With Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Moderate Nonsignificant Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: The Moderate VEin Graft LEsion Stenting With the Taxus Stent and Intravascular Ultrasound (VELETI) Pilot Trial
Circulation, November 17, 2009; 120(20): 1978 - 1986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
D. J. Kereiakes, M. A. Turco, J. Breall, N. Z. Farhat, R. L. Feldman, B. McLaurin, J. J. Popma, L. Mauri, P. Zimetbaum, J. Massaro, et al.
A Novel Filter-Based Distal Embolic Protection Device for Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Graft Lesions: Results of the AMEthyst Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., June 1, 2008; 1(3): 248 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Vermeersch, P. Agostoni, S. Verheye, P. Van den Heuvel, C. Convens, F. Van den Branden, G. Van Langenhove, and DELAYED RRISC (Death and Events at Long-term follo
Increased Late Mortality After Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Diseased Saphenous Vein Grafts: Results From the Randomized DELAYED RRISC Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 17, 2007; 50(3): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Schomig and A. Kastrati
Distal Embolic Protection in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Attractive Concept But No Evidence of Benefit
JAMA, March 2, 2005; 293(9): 1116 - 1118.
[Full Text] [PDF]