| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:2146.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the NMR Unit, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (P.M., K.W.F., R.G.S.S.), and Laboratory for Cardiovascular Science (P.M., E.G.L.), Gerontology Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Dr Richard Spencer, NMR Unit, GRC, National Institute on Aging/NIH, 5600 Nathan Shock Dr, Baltimore, MD 21224. E-mail spencer{at}helix.nih.gov
Background In the heart, striking functional differences exist after stimulation of the ß1- and ß2-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes. These may be linked to differences in metabolic response during ß1- and ß2-AR stimulation.
Methods and Results The relation between work and metabolism was examined during selective ß1- and ß2-AR stimulation (ß1 and ß2 groups, respectively) in the isolated perfused rat heart. Measurements were made of rate-pressure product (RPP=LV developed pressure x heart rate), phosphorus-containing metabolites, and pH by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and of O2 consumption by fiber-optic oximetry. Experiments were performed under high constant flow (HCF) and under flow-limiting conditions (constant pressure, CP). Despite substantially greater RPP increases relative to baseline during ß1-AR (HCF, 475%; CP, 150%) than ß2-AR (HCF, 90%; CP, 72%) stimulation, the relative decrease in the intracellular energy charge relative to baseline was similar for the ß1 (HCF, 49%; CP, 64%) and ß2 (HCF, 59%; CP, 55%) groups. For each group, an increase in oxygen consumption (M
O2) occurred commensurate with workload during HCF (ß1, 141%; ß2, 30%). During CP, however, the M
O2 increase was similar (ß1, 39%; ß2, 34%), despite the large RPP difference between the groups. During both protocols, there was greater acidosis during ß1-AR than during ß2-AR stimulation. Thus, at a given workload, intracellular energy charge decreased, and M
O2 (CP) increased to a greater extent during ß2 than ß1-AR stimulation.
Conclusions The bioenergetic differences are consistent with access to an additional substrate pool during ß1-AR stimulation. This may occur via increased glycogenolysis during ß1-AR stimulation, facilitating increased energy production by oxidative phosphorylation, and under flow-limiting conditions, anaerobic glycolysis.
Key Words: receptors, adrenergic, beta metabolism oxygen imaging
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. McConville, E. G. Lakatta, and R. G. Spencer Greater glycogen utilization during 1- than 2-adrenergic receptor stimulation in the isolated perfused rat heart Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1828 - E1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Boudina, S. Sena, B. T. O'Neill, P. Tathireddy, M. E. Young, and E. D. Abel Reduced Mitochondrial Oxidative Capacity and Increased Mitochondrial Uncoupling Impair Myocardial Energetics in Obesity Circulation, October 25, 2005; 112(17): 2686 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. McConville, R. G. Spencer, and E. G. Lakatta Temporal dynamics of inotropic, chronotropic, and metabolic responses during {beta}1- and {beta}2-AR stimulation in the isolated, perfused rat heart Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2005; 289(3): E412 - E418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |