(Circulation. 2003;107:1719.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, VA Central California Health Care System and University of California San Francisco Medical Education Program, Fresno, Calif, and University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif.
Correspondence to Prakash C. Deedwania, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, VA Central California Health Care System, UCSF Medical Education Program, 2615 East Clinton Ave (111), Fresno, CA 93703. E-mail deed@ucsfresno.edu
Key Words: Editorials heart failure survival death, sudden risk factor
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health problem in the United States. Nearly 5 million Americans suffer from HF, and an estimated 550 000 new cases of HF are diagnosed each year.1 HF is the No. 1 discharge diagnosis in patients
65 years of age and results in a substantial burden on healthcare expenditures. It is estimated that in 2001, more than $24 billion was spent as direct cost for the care of patients with HF.1 Furthermore, HF is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality.
See p 1764
Although considerable progress has been made in our approach to the pharmacological management of patients with HF, most patients remain at increased risk of cardiac death. To further improve outcomes in patients with HF, newer therapeutic modalities, including devices such as biventricular pacemaker, automatic internal cardioverter-defibrillators (AICDs), and left ventricular assist devices, have been increasingly utilized. Several recent randomized controlled trials have shown that such devices can indeed further improve the outcome in patients with HF.24 However, these devices are expensive, and their widespread or injudicious application in unselected patients with HF is likely to have a substantial impact on healthcare expenditures. On the other hand, appropriate use of device therapy in properly selected patients (who are at high risk of mortality) is essential to improve clinical outcome. Thus, there is a need to develop a strategy to accurately identify those patients with HF who are at increased risk of mortality. The paper by Vrtovec and associates5 in
Related Article:
Circulation 2003 107: 1764-1769.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Hombach, N. Merkle, J. Torzewski, J. M. Kraus, M. Kunze, O. Zimmermann, H. A. Kestler, and J. Wohrle Electrocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters as predictors of a worse outcome in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2009; 30(16): 2011 - 2018. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Palpant, S. M. Day, T. J. Herron, K. L. Converso, and J. M. Metzger Single histidine-substituted cardiac troponin I confers protection from age-related systolic and diastolic dysfunction Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2008; 80(2): 209 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-Y. Cho, J.-K. Song, W.-J. Park, S.-W. Han, S.-H. Choi, Y.-C. Doo, D.-J. Oh, and Y. Lee Mechanical Dyssynchrony Assessed by Tissue Doppler Imaging Is a Powerful Predictor of Mortality in Congestive Heart Failure With Normal QRS Duration J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 20, 2005; 46(12): 2237 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |