Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:1172-1175
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000023218.39412.32
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2002;106:1172.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Cardiology: New Frontiers

Principles From Clinical Trials Relevant to Clinical Practice: Part II

Robert M. Califf, MD; David L. DeMets, PhD

From the Duke Clinical Research Institute and the Division of Cardiology (R.M.C.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (D.L.D.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.

Correspondence to Robert M. Califf, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715.


Key Words: trials • cardiovascular diseases • therapy • outcome assessment • statistics


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
This last installment of a 4-part series discusses the final 5 of 11 principles derived from clinical trials during the last 2 decades of cardiovascular clinical research and the need to apply them to the care of individual patients with heart diseases.


*    Principle 7: Most Therapies Produce a Combination of Helpful and Harmful Effects
 
As therapies have become more biologically potent, it has become increasingly clear that every treatment can be harmful in some patients while being beneficial in others, and often both good and bad effects occur in the same patient. With many therapies, clinical characteristics can identify patients with greater expected benefit or risk, and pharmacogenetics may offer further insight into predicting which patients will achieve the greatest benefit and which will have the greatest risk of harm. For example, we know that women are at higher risk for torsades de pointes when they are treated with QT-interval-prolonging drugs, and it is likely that a genetic predisposition may be important.1 Unfortunately, however, the relative power of these findings is limited, and we are left with broad treatment guidelines that will leave patients at risk of harm that cannot be predicted in absolute terms.

The recognition that therapeutics are not commonly either "good" or "bad," but carry a mixture of good and bad effects, has spawned the concept of risk-management in therapeutics. Each clinician has the responsibility of helping the patient place these risks and benefits in perspective when making decisions about therapeutics. Inevitably, this approach will require an improved grasp of probabilities and quantitative outcome estimates by clinicians and patients. . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
G. Boriani, M. Biffi, A. Marziali, I. Diemberger, and C. Martignani
A changing scenario in the clinical use of implantable defibrillators: the need for long-term data on lead performance
Europace, January 1, 2009; 11(1): 1 - 3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. S. March, S. G. Silva, S. Compton, M. Shapiro, R. Califf, and R. Krishnan
The Case for Practical Clinical Trials in Psychiatry
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 162(5): 836 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul
Prior convictions: bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1929 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. M. Peterson and S. L. Jackson
Cost-effectiveness of Newer Antiplatelet Drugs
Arch Intern Med, November 10, 2003; 163(20): 2533 - 2534.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. R. Tunis, D. B. Stryer, and C. M. Clancy
Practical Clinical Trials: Increasing the Value of Clinical Research for Decision Making in Clinical and Health Policy
JAMA, September 24, 2003; 290(12): 1624 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. M. Califf and L. H. Muhlbaier
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): Must There Be a Trade-Off Between Privacy and Quality of Health Care, or Can We Advance Both?
Circulation, August 26, 2003; 108(8): 915 - 918.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. J. Bradley
Combining Resynchronization and Defibrillation Therapies for Heart Failure
JAMA, May 28, 2003; 289(20): 2719 - 2721.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
D. S. Sheps, K. E. Freedland, R. N. Golden, and R. P. McMahon
ENRICHD and SADHART: Implications for Future Biobehavioral Intervention Efforts
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2003; 65(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]