Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:746-751
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000023219.51483.66
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DeMets, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Califf, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congestive
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Circulation. 2002;106:746.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Cardiology: New Frontiers

Lessons Learned From Recent Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: Part I

David L. DeMets, PhD; Robert M. Califf, MD

From the Duke Clinical Research Institute (R.M.C.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and the Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (D.L.D.), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.

Correspondence to Robert M. Califf, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715.


Key Words: trials • cardiovascular diseases • therapy • outcome assessment • statistics


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
This is the first installment in a 4-part series of articles about our experiences with cardiovascular clinical research during the past 2 decades. From our vantage points as statistical and clinical researchers, we derive a series of lessons from recent clinical trials and incorporate them into principles designed to guide the practicing clinician who cares for patients with heart diseases.

We are entering an era in which the imperative to understand the rational basis for diagnostic and therapeutic options has become a major force in medical care. Medical products (drugs, devices, and biologics) are proliferating simultaneously with a substantial restructuring of the delivery of health care, with a focus on evidence to support medical interventions. As the texture of evidence to support clinical practice becomes clearer, the imperative to investigate the effectiveness of behavioral interventions becomes more important. When coupled with concern about the rising cost of medical care, this proliferation of technological and behavioral intervention reinforces the view that we cannot afford to offer all possible diagnostic and therapeutic options to all patients. Recent publicity about therapies that were in widespread use and were later found to be detrimental1–3 has fueled this concern to extend well beyond the cost implications. The advent of genomics, proteomics, combinatorial chemistry, and advanced biomedical engineering will increase the importance of developing rational evidence about therapeutic risks and benefits. This effort to develop a rational basis for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions on the basis of quantitative assessments is a major component of evidence-based medicine.

. . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. Tonelli, B. Hemmelgarn, T. Reiman, B. Manns, M. N. Reaume, A. Lloyd, N. Wiebe, and S. Klarenbach
Benefits and harms of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia related to cancer: a meta-analysis
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 26, 2009; 180(11): E62 - E71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Lim, A. Brown, A. Helmy, S. Mussa, and D. G. Altman
Composite Outcomes in Cardiovascular Research: A Survey of Randomized Trials
Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2008; 149(9): 612 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. N. DeMaria
Clinical trials and clinical judgment.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 18, 2008; 51(11): 1120 - 1122.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. F. Hernandez, G. C. Fonarow, and E. D. Peterson
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Heart Failure, and Patient Characteristics--Reply
JAMA, January 23, 2008; 299(3): 286 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. A. Harrington, V. Hasselblad, and R. M. Califf
Defining and utilizing surrogates in the evaluation of coronary stents: what do we really want and need to know?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2008; 51(1): 33 - 36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
N. Mayer-Hamblett, B. W. Ramsey, and R. A. Kronmal
Advancing Outcome Measures for the New Era of Drug Development in Cystic Fibrosis
Proceedings of the ATS, August 1, 2007; 4(4): 370 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
The TRIUMPH Investigators
Effect of Tilarginine Acetate in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock: The TRIUMPH Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, April 18, 2007; 297(15): 1657 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
I. Ferreira-Gonzalez, G. Permanyer-Miralda, A. Domingo-Salvany, J. W Busse, D. Heels-Ansdell, V. M Montori, E. A Akl, D. M Bryant, P. Alonso-Coello, J. Alonso, et al.
Problems with use of composite end points in cardiovascular trials: systematic review of randomised controlled trials
BMJ, April 14, 2007; 334(7597): 786 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin TrialsHome page
R. M Califf
Clinical trials bureaucracy: unintended consequences of well-intentioned policy
Clinical Trials, December 1, 2006; 3(6): 496 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
C. B. Granger and J. J.V. McMurray
Using Measures of Disease Progression to Determine Therapeutic Effect: A Sirens' Song
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2006; 48(3): 434 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.-C. Tardif, T. Heinonen, D. Orloff, and P. Libby
Vascular Biomarkers and Surrogates in Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, June 27, 2006; 113(25): 2936 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. E. Freedland, G. E. Miller, and D. S. Sheps
The Great Debate, revisited.
Psychosom Med, March 1, 2006; 68(2): 179 - 184.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. S. Brody, H. Sucharew, J. D. Campbell, S. P. Millard, P. L. Molina, J. S. Klein, and J. Quan
Computed Tomography Correlates with Pulmonary Exacerbations in Children with Cystic Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 2005; 172(9): 1128 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
D. N. Reddan, L. A. Szczech, V. Hasselblad, E. G. Lowrie, R. M. Lindsay, J. Himmelfarb, R. D. Toto, J. Stivelman, J. F. Winchester, L. A. Zillman, et al.
Intradialytic Blood Volume Monitoring in Ambulatory Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Trial
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 2162 - 2169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. PsychiatryHome page
J. S. March, S. G. Silva, S. Compton, M. Shapiro, R. Califf, and R. Krishnan
The Case for Practical Clinical Trials in Psychiatry
Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2005; 162(5): 836 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. A. Blumenthal, A. Sherwood, M. A. Babyak, L. L. Watkins, R. Waugh, A. Georgiades, S. L. Bacon, J. Hayano, R. E. Coleman, and A. Hinderliter
Effects of Exercise and Stress Management Training on Markers of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, April 6, 2005; 293(13): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul
Prior convictions: bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 2, 2004; 43(11): 1929 - 1939.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. Massel
Composite confusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1926 - 1927.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. Casas, L. A. Cubillos-Garzon, and C. A. Morillo
Regional Pathologies and Globalization of Clinical Trials: Has the Time for Regional Trials Arrived?
Circulation, May 27, 2003; 107 (20): e194 - e194.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. M. Kessler, D. L. DeMets, and R. M. Califf
Combining Composite Endpoints: Counterintuitive or a Mathematical Impossibility? * Response
Circulation, March 11, 2003; 107 (9): e70 - e70.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
D. S. Sheps, K. E. Freedland, R. N. Golden, and R. P. McMahon
ENRICHD and SADHART: Implications for Future Biobehavioral Intervention Efforts
Psychosom Med, January 1, 2003; 65(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. J. Bax, E. E. Van der Wall, M. J. Schalij, S. S. Gottlieb, M. L. Fisher, W. T. Abraham, and the MIRACLE Study Group
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure
N. Engl. J. Med., November 28, 2002; 347(22): 1803 - 1804.
[Full Text] [PDF]